- From: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:35:56 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>, baran_H <baran.ha@gmail.com>
On 21/06/10 14:37, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:29:01 +0100 > Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com> wrote: > >> This conflicts with <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5.1020>, >> where @src is only used to provide a subject. > > In fact, any of @about, @src, @resource and @href can be used to set > either the subject or the object. Right (and of course @rev can do that too). I should have been more specific: sec 5.5 5 (which deals with the presence of @rel and @src). > Though the quote you mentioned: > >> A [URI resource] object can be set using one of @rel or @rev to >> express a [predicate], and then either using one of @href, @resource >> or @src to provide an object resource explicitly > > ... doesn't seem to be referring to that. It seems to be a relic of > very old drafts where @src was treated more like @href. > The reporter (ccd) thought: <img about='#personX' rel='foaf:img' src='http://xy.com/X.jpg' /> would work. Not unreasonable. I had to check whether @src was like @href myself. Thanks Toby, Damian
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 14:36:48 UTC