- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 21:42:55 +0100
- To: Sergey Chernyshev <sergey.chernyshev@gmail.com>
- Cc: RDFa Community <public-rdfa@w3.org>
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:29:09 -0400 Sergey Chernyshev <sergey.chernyshev@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I was originally mailing the old list, but it's still > mentioned all over the place - what's the right place for such > questions? Hope public+rdfa is the right place ;) Yep, public-rdfa is the place for general questions. > I'm sorry for not following whole HTML5 + RDFa discussion to close > lately, by I came across the practical issue of picking a DOCTYPE for > my project on performance side (Show Slow) and there are no reasons > why I shouldn't pick HTML5 DOCTYPE except for one - I want RDFa there. There's an HTML+RDFa specification published by the HTML Working Group with input from the RDFa Working Group. It's still just a Working Draft, and it's not supported by the W3C validator, but if you're not concerned about getting a big green tick from the validator, it's probably your best bet. HTML5+RDFa is supported by my Perl RDFa parser, RDF::RDFa::Parser; by Ivan's PyRDFa, and by Damien Steer's java-rdfa. Probably others too. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 5 July 2010 20:44:03 UTC