Re: Restarting work on RDFa validator ...

Steven,

> Good work!

Thanks for your feedback!

> Some observations:
> 
> It fails to deal with redirects.

Ahm. Sorry? Can you give an example, please?
 
> Hitting [return] after typing in the URL doesn't initiate the validation.

True. Not implemented (yet ;)
 
> It objects (wrongly) to rel="meta"
 > It wrongly complains about rel="author dc:creator"

Taken from http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/ - 'meta' is my bad, will fix
it, however 'author' is not a reserved term ...
 
> It seems not to recognise relative URI's in @href and @src:
>     expected URI for @href and found 'CV.css' which is a unknown URIref
> type (invalid)

Thank. Gotta check this.
 
> Is the "Show full results" check box meant to toggle between showing
> everything and only the errors? It didn't seem to work for me. In any
> case, I would prefer the defaults to be only errors shown (and a message
> that there were no errors if there are none).

Well spotted and yes, I can change this if this seems more logical ;)

> In the following message:
> 
> <<<<
>    242: and <a rel="Copyright"
> href="/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software">software
> 
>    expected white-space separated list of CURIEs or reserved term for @rel
>    and found 'Copyright' which is a { URI } (invalid)
>>>>> 
> 
> I would prefer it to say '"Copyright" is not a recognised rel value', or
> similar.

Hm. Well that stems from the fact that I check in two phases; first try to
determine the URIref type and the check against allowed values for RDFa
attributes. Will consider this.


Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
> Organization: CWI/W3C
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:49:24 +0200
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Public RDFa
> <public-rdfa@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Restarting work on RDFa validator ...
> 
> Good work!
> 
> Some observations:
> 
> It fails to deal with redirects.
> 
> Hitting [return] after typing in the URL doesn't initiate the validation.
> 
> It objects (wrongly) to rel="meta"
> 
> It wrongly complains about rel="author dc:creator"
> 
> It seems not to recognise relative URI's in @href and @src:
>     expected URI for @href and found 'CV.css' which is a unknown URIref
> type (invalid)
> 
> Is the "Show full results" check box meant to toggle between showing
> everything and only the errors? It didn't seem to work for me. In any
> case, I would prefer the defaults to be only errors shown (and a message
> that there were no errors if there are none).
> 
> In the following message:
> 
> <<<<
>    242: and <a rel="Copyright"
> href="/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software">software
> 
>    expected white-space separated list of CURIEs or reserved term for @rel
>    and found 'Copyright' which is a { URI } (invalid)
>>>>> 
> 
> I would prefer it to say '"Copyright" is not a recognised rel value', or
> similar.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Steven
> 
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:18:56 +0200, Michael Hausenblas
> <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Motivated by the recent discussion around RDFa validation [1] and based
>> on
>> Manu's proposal re the JSON interface [2], I've now continued my work on
>> the
>> RDFa validator 'vrdfa'. I've changed it from client-side/JS-based to
>> server-side/PHP processing.
>> 
>> Please have a look at vrdfa [3] (see also the source at [4]). Currently,
>> only the RDFa attribute values (URI, CURIE, safe CURIE as of [5]) are
>> checked, but I'm open to feature requests. Second thing to consider is
>> where
>> to host such a a service, as the current location is not really designed
>> to
>> serve as a production server.
>> 
>> If you want to test the JSON API, please use following template:
>> 
>> http://ld2sd.deri.org/vrdfa/vrdfa.php?URI={YOUR-RDFa-DOCUMENT}&format=json
>> 
>> Note: if no format is given, plain text results are returned; next
>> planned
>> is an EARL/RDFa output.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>       Michael
>> 
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa/2009Sep/0016
>> [2]  
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Sep/0175
>> [3] http://ld2sd.deri.org/vrdfa/
>> [4] http://bitbucket.org/mhausenblas/vrdfa/
>> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#rdfa-attributes
>> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 10:41:57 UTC