Re: [Fwd: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa]

I agree that this is great news.  However, when I went and LOOKED at the 
page we use in our examples, http://dbpedia.org/page/Albert_Einstein , I 
see that it is invalid in a number of respects.  It is unfortunate that 
dbpedia is at the mercy of the resources they troll.  The markup ends up 
being hard to manage, I suspect. 

I was forced to put my parser into "html" mode to get it to swallow that 
page:

http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/rdfa/extract_rdfa.pl?format=n3&type=html&uri=http://dbpedia.org/page/Albert_Einstein

Ivan Herman wrote:
> FYI
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: DBpedia Pages now include RDFa
> Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:32:01 +0000
> Resent-From: public-lod@w3.org
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:31:19 -0400
> From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
> To: public-lod@w3.org
> CC: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>,
> "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net"
> <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
> References:
> <f914914c0909160749s4adaa3b5q517b418a1b0a9619@mail.gmail.com>
> <4AB1024E.4000309@openlinksw.com>
>
> All,
>
> Quick FYI.
>
> All DBpedia pages now include RDFa. Thus, re. the DBpedia Linked Data
> Space, you now have HTML+RDFa as a structured metadata representation
> alternative to N3, Turtle, RDF/XML, and RDF/JSON (*new*).
>
>   

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com

Received on Thursday, 17 September 2009 15:02:13 UTC