- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:17:57 +0100
- To: Roberto García <roberto@rhizomik.net>
- Cc: public-rdfa@w3.org
On 5 Sep 2009, at 07:49, Roberto García wrote: > I've been able to find some references to this issue but it is not > clear for me if at last it is possible to use some sort of construct > that makes this easier than modelling all the triples for the list > with rdf:first, rdf:rest, rdf:nil,... Yes, rdf:Lists are truly horrible in RDFa. In fairness to RDFa, they're just a very complex structure and are horrible in a lot of RDF serialisations - N-Triples, TriX, RDF/JSON, etc. The only serialisations where they seem reasonable are those that provide syntactic sugar to handle them - e.g. Turtle and RDF/XML. Here's how I've marked up lists in RDFa: http://ontologi.es/rail/routes/gb/VTB1.xhtml -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2009 12:18:36 UTC