- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:36:47 +0100
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, "public-rdfa@w3.org" <public-rdfa@w3.org>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
> <div about="./maddie.jpg"> Nitpick: just maddie.jpg (and below) > <h2 property="dc:title">Please</h2> > <img src="./maddie.jpg" /> Remember all the discussions we had about allowing @src to be a subject? A future simplification of RDFa can surely drop the rules about @src, simply because they will hardly ever be used in real life. > <a rel="license" > href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"> > <img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" > src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/3.0/88x31.png" > /></a><br /> I would put these lines lower down to gather all the licence information in one place. Oh wait, it's there as well. Delete this then. > <em property="dc:description">Maddie begs for a treat.</em> > Tags: <span property="dc:subject">dog</span>, > <span property="dc:subject">cute</span>, > <span property="dc:subject">beg</span><br /> I was surprised to see dc:subject being used like this, but Dublin Core says "Typically, the subject will be represented using keywords, key phrases, or classification codes. Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary. To describe the spatial or temporal topic of the resource, use the Coverage element." so I guess I'm overruled! > Taken on <span property="dc:date" datatype="xsd:date" > content="2008-12-15">Dec. 15th</span> dc:date looks reasonable, but I notice some people complaining. Interestingly the wording for dc:coverage seems to deal with both time and lat/long: "The spatial or temporal topic of the resource". "Spatial topic and spatial applicability may be a named place or a location specified by its geographic coordinates. Temporal topic may be a named period, date, or date range." > by <a rel="dc:creator" href="http://yergler.net/#me"><span > property="foaf:name">Nathan Yergler</span></a>. No need for the span: by <a rel="dc:creator" href="http://yergler.net/#me" property="foaf:name">Nathan Yergler</a>. > (<span property="geo:latitude">57.64911</span>/<span > property="geo:longitude">10.40744</span>) This smells of the primary-topic-of debate, the difference between the location of the photo, and the location of what the photo depicts. If the image were of a painting by Van Gogh would we expect the lat/long to tell us where it hangs, or of where it depicts? > <br /> > This work by <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" > > href="http://labs.creativecommons.org/~nathan/image-rdfa/madeline.html" > property="cc:attributionName" rel="cc:attributionURL">Nathan R. > Yergler</a> I don't like the link with text of someone's name leading to an image of his dog; I bet he doesn't either! The link to the dog should be around "This work". The href can be "", though you might prefer it not to be for didactic reasons, but it does explain the text "This work" better. Nathan's name should just be in a span. > is licensed under a > <a rel="license" > > href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">Creative Commons > Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License</a>. > </div> Best wishes, Steven
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 14:37:06 UTC