Hi Ivan, I do not think we disagree. I remember we discussed this issue sometimes > early this year, and it seems that my memory failed me when I > implemented the current model. > I didn't think we disagreed, it was just that a number of emails seemed to be along the lines of "but we'll wait to see what Ben, Mark, et. al. think about this", so I was giving my input. And I thought that whilst I was there I'd explain the different permutations, since other implementers seemed to be concerned about this. By the way, you might have also forgotten that it was you who spotted the flaw in the original algorithm! It was thanks to you that the recurse flag was even added. :) However, it would still be good to have official test cases added to the > test suite to clearly document the issues. Indeed. Although I was certain we had such tests, so this has come as a surprise to me. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Monday, 15 December 2008 13:00:35 UTC