- From: Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:13:24 +0100
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGxST9ksG3s9cS-+B=yr3EGRhWTQrk=DPgJLUEub5s7XO1w=QQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ivan! It's not a matter of it being done easily, or soon. It's just an idea that now is being listed as a proposal. And I am contented with *this*! The power of RDFa is that it allows content and attributes to provide values for the "properties", and it's obvious that, as more elements and values are added/refined (HTML5.1 is still in its defining phase for some items), RDFa is going to evolve as well. As a matter of fact, I see HTML+RDFa as something similar to Microdata - with the difference that RDFa has a wider spread, is extensible, easier to read and basically usable. Thank you. 2015-03-20 17:57 GMT+01:00 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>: > Andrea, > > I have added this to the official errata: > > > https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDFa_1.1._Errata#Using_.3Cdata.3E_and_.40value > > as the errata says: adding this feature means adding a new technical > feature, which is a substantial change. Cannot be done easily, alas! > > Thanks! > > ivan > > > > On 17 Mar 2015, at 20:31 , Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Greetings to all, and hope you can give me answers or suggestions. > > I was reviewing the spec about RDFa core and I focused on a frequent use > case in my models. Sometimes I use <data> element to indicate price values > for internationalisation and machine-readability. For user readability > currencies can be indicated with symbols, decimal separators with commas > and there could be spaces or single quotes to separate thousands, but it's > not an acceptable value. So a price of € 1'234,56 could be set as follows: > > <data value="EUR">€</data> <data value="1234.56">1'234,56</data> > > I often use Schema.org class vocabularies for semantic markup as this > allows to specify the price entity by also separating numbers and currency. > I also want to use RDFa for semantic markup. I know that I could specify > @content in order to indicate the machine readable value, but I'd like to > know whether @value could ever be taken into account as attribute to look > at for content of some properties. > > It would also be useful on ordered lists, as @value on list items can be > used to force an item number in the list, and it could have a semantic > meaning (e.g. the number of an item in a collection of creative works), or > even on form elements (e.g. when used as readonly). > > Is there any hope for this? > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > >
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 17:13:51 UTC