Re: RDFa 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation

Well done, for sure! Thank you for having conceived and upgraded such a
powerful tool.
For my personal (and as of now limited) experience I tend to use RDFa Lite
variant, with uses of @rel and @content attributes only where allowed in
XHTML document. And I see that the "Recommendation" status extends to that,
too.

Yours truly,
Andrea Rendine

2015-03-18 9:54 GMT+01:00 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>:

> See below.
>
> With this our last official business for this group is done. W3M should
> officially close the WG (its charter has long expired, b.t.w.).
>
> Thanks for all the work on these now and in the past. I believe we had a
> good time:-)
>
> Ivan
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > Date: 17 Mar 2015 19:48:35 CET
> > To: w3c-ac-forum@w3.org
> > From: "Coralie Mercier" <coralie@w3.org>
> > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.xvnnu9lgsvvqwp@sith.local>
> > Resent-From: w3c-ac-members@w3.org
> > Subject: RDFa 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation
> > List-Id: <w3t.w3.org>
> >
> >
> > Dear Advisory Committee Representative,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce the advancement of four RDFa 1.1 documents to
> Recommendations:
> >
> >  HTML+RDFa 1.1 - Second Edition
> >  http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-html-rdfa-20150317/
> >
> >  RDFa Core 1.1 - Third Edition
> >  http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-rdfa-core-20150317/
> >
> >  RDFa Lite 1.1 - Second Edition
> >  http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-rdfa-lite-20150317/
> >
> >  XHTML+RDFa 1.1 - Third Edition
> >  http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-xhtml-rdfa-20150317/
> >
> >
> > All Members who responded to the Call for Review [1] of the Proposed
> Recommendations except one supported the publication of those
> specifications as W3C Recommendations. One Member, Yandex, objected saying
> the conformance section for RDFa Lite 1.1 - Second Edition <
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/RDFa11-PER/results#xspec3> was too
> minimal.
> >
> > The non-normative section 2 of the specification indicates the RFDa Lite
> attributes are conformant to the ones defined in RDFa Core 1.1 <
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core> and also pre-defines a number of
> prefixes, but this is not reflected adequately in normative section 3.1,
> Document Conformance. However, the changes in the Proposed Edited
> Recommendation did not affect the conformance section and that section
> remains identical to the previously published Recommendation. Accordingly,
> it is still appropriate to update the Recommendation. The two issues are
> noted as errata in the status section in the new Recommendation and W3C is
> expected to address these errata in a future update per Process 2014, as
> the changes to the conformance section would not introduce new features.
> >
> > Please join us in thanking the RDFa Working Group [2] for their hard
> work and congratulating them on this achievement.
> >
> > This announcement follows section 8.1.2 [3] of the W3C Process Document.
> >
> > For Tim Berners-Lee, Director,
> > Ralph Swick, Information and Knowledge Domain Lead, and
> > Ivan Herman, RDFa Working Group Team Contact;
> > Coralie Mercier, Acting Head of W3C Marketing & Communications
> >
> > [1] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/RDFa11-PER/results
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/
> > [3] https://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#ACReviewAfter
> >
> > --
> > Coralie Mercier  -  W3C Communications Team  -  http://www.w3.org
> > mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
> >
> >
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>