Re: PER-s for RDFa 1.1

I imagine I could find some cycles to do this.  There might also be a
couple of minor DTD and XML Schema things that need fixing.  Let me check
my notes.

On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

>
> > On 27 Nov 2014, at 11:55 , Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > Manu, Ralph, Shane,
> >
> > we have a pending issue that we are now in position to close. Per[1] we
> had to pending issues in HTML+RDFa, waiting for the HTML5
>
> to -> two :-)
>
> > and the RDF1.1 recommendations to be published. This is now done. This
> means that we would have re-publish the HTML+RDFa1.1 document with
> following actions:
> >
> > - remove the note in the Status section of [1]
> > - in section 3.1 step 9 the last sentence should be removed; @datetime
> is now normative
> > - in section 3.1 step 11 the last sentence should simply say: "This
> feature is non-normative" (Alas!, due to the delay of DOM3, the HTML
> datatype is not normative in RDF1.1 Concepts[2]...)
>
> Additional, minor things:
>
> - the reference to HTML5 should be updated to Rec
> - The RDF concepts and Turtle references should become normative and
> updated.
> - Actually I do not know what the XHTML+RDFa1.1 reference is as an
> informal and referring to the PER an not the Rec; I think that was an
> oversight at the final publication step. Anyway, that should be updated as
> well.
>
> Ivan
>
>
> >
> > This is the minimum that we should do, leading to a PER transition
> request, and a republication of [1] as an (Edited) Recommendation. Once
> that done, the RDFa WG[3] should be formally closed.
> >
> > However, we should probably do a bit more. The errata document for
> RDFa[4] also contains some minor errors. All of them are, as far as I can
> see, editorial. Caveat: that means we have to republish (as PER-s) not only
> HTML+RDFa, but RDFa Lite, RDFa Core, and XHTML+RDFa. Plus some error in the
> RDFa Primer note. Ie, the whole lot.
> >
> > I think we should do this asap and close the RDFa 1.1 group. If we all
> agree, we may be able to issue a formal AC review call for the PER before
> Xmas; I guess the work required is pretty insignificant. (There is a
> publication moratorium starting the 19th of December up to the 5th of
> January.) Manu, Shane, if you have problems generating the new versions for
> whatever reasons, I can also do these editings myself.
> >
> > Ralph, I presume we can handle everything by email, we do not need a
> formal transition call for this; we are talking about PER-s.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-html-rdfa-20130822/
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/
> > [4] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/errata.html
> >
> > ----
> > Ivan Herman, W3C
> > Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > mobile: +31-641044153
> > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.