Re: IMPORTANT: PERs for RDFa Core 1.1, RDFa Lite 1.1, HTML+RDFa 1.1, and XHTML+RDFa 1.1

Aren't we also incorporating the errata from
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/errata.html? For example in
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PER-rdfa-core-20141216/, EXAMPLE 123 is still
missing the closing double quote.


On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> RDFa WG members,
>
> HTML5 is now an official W3C recommendation. This means that we have to
> update RDFa to point to the new HTML5 spec, which means that we have to
> publish PERs for those documents. While we're at it, we should integrate
> the errata for each document. Ivan and Shane have already prepared the
> documents.
>
> This is a call for consensus to publish Proposed Edited Recommendations
> for RDFa Core 1.1, RDFa Lite 1.1, HTML+RDFa 1.1, and XHTML+RDFa 1.1. The
> publication-ready documents can be found here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PER-rdfa-core-20141216/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PER-xhtml-rdfa-20141216/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PER-html-rdfa-20141216/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/PER-rdfa-lite-20141216/
>
> PROPOSAL: Publish RDFa Core 1.1, RDFa Lite 1.1, HTML+RDFa 1.1, and
> XHTML+RDFa 1.1 as Proposed Edited Recommendations with a requested
> publication date of December 16th 2014 for Advisory Committee vote.
>
> Please +1/+0/-1 the proposal above.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments
> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
>
>


-- 
Steph.