W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Test 0332 Error - XML Variant - Missing xml:lang?

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 21:23:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnF9_rgxTrME39M+0UUru1T73abYtTSTC8H9p+1eZZ5Afw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com>
Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
https://github.com/rdfa/rdfa-website/pull/43/files looks good?


On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Awesome! I'll get that fixed then.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, didn't see this till now.
>>
>> For an XML-oriented processor, the lang="en" attribute would just be
>> ignored.  Having both would be just fine for my processor.  I can't
>> imagine it hurting others because they aren't suppose to recognize
>> anything other than the xml:lang attribute.
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet
>> <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 3 July 2014 06:19, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wednesday, July 2, 2014, Alex Miłowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I don't see any problem with XML has a host language.  There are
>> >> >> plenty of XML vocabularies that will benefit from RDFa.  In fact,
>> RDFa
>> >> >> is being added to DocBook and will be valid DocBook for version 5.1.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > It's not the XML is a bad host language, but that this test isn't
>> setup
>> >> > to
>> >> > run in XML mode. It could be if @lang were changed to &xml:lang, but
>> >> > that
>> >> > may not be the point if the test. Easiest thing would be to just
>> remove
>> >> > XML
>> >> > from the set if host languages for this particular test in the test
>> >> > manifest.
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Meanwhile, the test seems just incorrect.  The only language
>> attribute
>> >> >> available that is universally recognized is xml:lang.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The simple solution is to correct the input document in the test
>> case.
>> >> >
>> >> > Either way, perhaps the test author can chime in with specifically
>> what
>> >> > the
>> >> > purpose of the test is.
>> >>
>> >> I did not write that particular test (scor did), but it is related to
>> >> tests I did write (0330 and 0331). The original discussion was at
>> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Apr/0012.html.
>> >>
>> >> These were created for the web page
>> >> http://reecedunn.co.uk/espeak-for-android (HTML5 page) for which the
>> >> rdf/rdfa ruby module incorrectly extracted the:
>> >>
>> >> <li content='af' datatype='dct:RFC5646'
>> >> property='s:countriesSupported'>Afrikaans</li>
>> >>
>> >> metadata as the page had <html lang="en"> declared at the top (i.e. it
>> >> used the lang property, not the datatype property as other tools did).
>> >>
>> >> I am happy for:
>> >>
>> >> 1.  these tests to be restricted to the HTML (and possibly the XHTML
>> >> tests);
>> >> 2.  a new set of tests based on 0330-0332 using xml:lang instead.
>> >
>> >
>> > Would having the polyglot notation with both lang="en" and xml:lang="en"
>> > solve the problems here? or would lang="en" still make XML unhappy?
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> NOTE: The 0332 test references 7.5 step 11 in the specification.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> - Reece
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steph.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --Alex Milowski
>> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of
>> the
>> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
>> considered."
>>
>> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Steph.
>



-- 
Steph.
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2014 01:23:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:35 UTC