Re: PR submission report

Gregg,

(I could have done things myself, but I could not pull this from github; no idea
why and I do not want to spend time on getting around the mysteries of git...)

However. We should not/cannot publish this under /TR. /TR is only for
publications that go through the whole publishing round with the webmaster,
check, etc, and is declared to be a W3C note or rec.

I digged up what we did for the previous round; we put the test results into:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/CR-implementation-report-20120503/

and this is the URI we used, referring from

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/CR-ImplementationReport

which is then referred to in the PR transition request:

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2012AprJun/0042.html

We can either go the same way, giving an explanation on the wiki (which is
almost the same as what is there now) and put the implementation report into

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2013/CR-implementation-report-20130531/

(although I am not sure why 'draft' appeared in that URI, but, oh well...)

Or we can jump over the wiki page and refer to that document directly from the
transition request. For the reason of symmetry I would be in favour to do the
same as we did in 2012.

Thanks!

Ivan

Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> I re-ran reports and published a frozen version at http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdfa-earl-2013-05-29.html. This is set as an IR, so it should also be published in TR space at the locations specified within the document. The complete report, including other host language and version variations is at http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/, which is probably more useful for developers selecting a conforming implementation.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
> 
> 

-- 
Ivan Herman, W3C
Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me