- From: Sebastian Heath <sebastian.heath@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 07:14:29 -0400
- To: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Understood, Ivan. So can we re-open 147 on the hypothetical rdfa1.2? And also the white-space handling rules. Those are slightly off as well. -Sebastian P.s. but why not start a process akin to html5.1 now? There is always honor in working to get things right. --------- Sent from my cell phone On May 28, 2013, at 3:16 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Sebastian, > > the only thing we can do right now is to do what, well, Manu has just done, ie, to record these things in the tracker. Frankly: I have no idea when a new Working Group will be set up to settle RDFa 1.2, so you should not hold your breath... > > Ivan > > Sebastian Heath wrote: >> What is the process for nominating an issue to be reconsidered for >> rdfa 1.2? I would like to see that happen for the discussion that came >> out of ISSUE 147 [1]. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Sebastian >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/147 >> >> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:43 PM, RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker >> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>> ISSUE-150 (Property Copying in Core): Move the Property Copying feature from HTML+RDFa to RDFa Core [RDFa 1.2+] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/150 >>> >>> Raised by: Manu Sporny >>> On product: RDFa 1.2+ >>> >>> Alex Milowski suggested that we should move the Property Copying feature from HTML+RDFa to RDFa Core. The feature is currently in HTML+RDFa because it was too late to put it into RDFa Core at the time we found consensus on the feature. Many implementations implement Property Copying, it was always designed to go into RDFa Core. The next RDFa WG should move this feature into RDFa Core. > > -- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 11:15:10 UTC