- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 21:06:09 -0700
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 04:06:36 UTC
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > On May 14, 2013, at 19:07 , Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: > > > It also seems to me that HTML literals belong in the core at some point > in the future. > > Actually... I am not sure. HTML Literals are specifically aimed at... > HTML. I am not sure it would make sense to use HTML Literals in, say, RDFa > annotated SVG... > Sure, but no more than it does to use XML literals in an HTML serialized document. It just feels like a basic literal type to me that should be there in the core regardless of whether or not the host language can actually support it. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 04:06:36 UTC