- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 20:58:58 -0700
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABp3FNLGu4GE54ccyCXWQEg_B4XcU19xjVK3qjPjVO4+f-5xRA@mail.gmail.com>
OK. I'll be blunt. I don't understand the modification described in the HTML+RDFa 1.1 document at all. The intent helps but doesn't clarify the text in the document. On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>wrote: > > On May 14, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: > > > The HTML+RDFa 1.1 spec says: > > > > "In Section 7.5, processing step 5, if no IRI is provided by a resource > attribute (e.g., @about, @href, @resource, or @src), then first check to > see if the element is the head or body element. If it is, then set new > subject to parent object." > > > > and > > > > "In Section 7.5, processing step 6, if no IRI is provided by a resource > attribute (e.g., @about, @href, @resource, or @src), then first check to > see if the element is the head or body element. If it is, then set new > subject to parent object." > > > > but step 5 has two parts. It is unclear how each part is modified: > > > > 1. Do you all mean that the new subject is only set if the element is > 'head' or 'body'? > > 2. In 5.1 and 5.2, the final default for the new subject is the value of > the parent object. > > > > Also, for step 6, the default is already the parent object. > > > > I'm really not understanding what you all are after here. > > Just to clarify the intent, if you were to place @typeof on the <html> > element, it would get an implied base of the document location; however, > without these special rules, if you did the same on <body> or <head>, it > could create a new BNode subject. This rule causes it to take the subject > from the parent, which would either be the document location, or some other > declared subject. This is a common source of problems, thus the special > rule. > > Gregg > > > -- > > --Alex Milowski > > "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of > the > > inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language > > considered." > > > > Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics > > -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 03:59:24 UTC