Re: PROPOSAL: Add prefixes to RDFa Core initial context

+1

Ivan

On Mar 27, 2013, at 14:48 , Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On 03/27/2013 03:57 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> maybe this is one of those issues that do not require telco time and
>> can be formally voted on the mailing list. See my mail:
>> 
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Mar/0015.html
>> 
>> the only difference between then and now is that SPARQL is actually a
>> Rec already, and PROV is in PR. And we are not obliged to wait for
>> the publication of the RDFa PR for this...
> 
> Agreed,
> 
> """
> PROPOSAL: Add the following prefixes to the RDFa Core initial context
> located at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1
> 
> rr: http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml#
> sd: http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#
> prov: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
> dc11: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
> """
> 
> +1
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
> http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 13:52:19 UTC