- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:57:01 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Manu, maybe this is one of those issues that do not require telco time and can be formally voted on the mailing list. See my mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Mar/0015.html the only difference between then and now is that SPARQL is actually a Rec already, and PROV is in PR. And we are not obliged to wait for the publication of the RDFa PR for this... Ivan On Mar 26, 2013, at 20:03 , Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > Can we assume this is in the pipeline and will go ahead? > > Dan > > On 1 March 2013 08:16, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> Good point. We made the commitment not to change the context file often, so I did not make a change yet. Manu, should we introduce this change now and make it official? Are there other additions that we may want to consider? >> >> If we change this, we will have to make some tam-tam around it; implementers should be notified. >> >> (Eg, two W3C Recs are coming up, namely prov and sparql, both have some vocabulary additions; those may be added right away, ie, as soon as PR is up) >> >> Ivan >> >> >> On Mar 1, 2013, at 17:11 , Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: >> >>> +cc Antoine >>> >>> Where are we with this? Do you still plan to add dc11 expansion into >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 ? >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> On 20 November 2012 21:37, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >>>> I am fine with this change. >>>> >>>> WG: process question. If we accept this change, when should we do this? We are bound by a promise not to make changes often. I would therefore propose to make this change when html5+rdfa goes to CR. Tom, this would be sometimes January-February time range. Would that be fine? >>>> >>>> Ivan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 16:28 , Gregg Kellogg wrote: >>>> >>>>> ΩOn Nov 20, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear RDFa WG, >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently, the prefixes "dc:" and "dcterms:" are both mapped in the RDFa >>>>>> Initial Context to the namespace URI http://purl.org/dc/terms/ (here: >>>>>> "/terms/") [1]. >>>>>> >>>>>> It has been pointed out that a considerable amount of data uses, or maps to, >>>>>> DCMI properties with the namespace URI http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ (here: >>>>>> "/1.1/"), which in other contexts has traditionally been mapped to the prefix >>>>>> "dc:". >>>>>> >>>>>> Most of the /terms/ properties have ranges restricted to either literal or >>>>>> non-literal values, while the /1.1/ properties are rangeless (rdfs:Resource by >>>>>> default) -- a characteristic some users see as an advantage (see [2]). >>>>>> >>>>>> DCMI would like to propose to the RDFa Working Group that the prefix "dc11:" be >>>>>> added to the Initial Context for the /1.1/ namespace URI. >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Gregg >>>>> >>>>>> People who have used "dc:" for /1.1/ properties will need to explicitly declare >>>>>> this as a prefix. However, for those who continue to use /1.1/ properties -- >>>>>> in some cases, precisely because they are rangeless -- inclusion in the Initial >>>>>> Context would emphasize that /1.1/ has not been forgotten or deprecated, >>>>>> reinforce the message that /1.1/ properties should not be "upgraded" to /terms/ >>>>>> properties in a mechanical way, and provide a conventional prefix to use for >>>>>> the properties. >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks for your consideration, >>>>>> Tom >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 >>>>>> [2] http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/FAQ/DC_and_DCTERMS_Namespaces >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org> >>>>>> Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Ltd >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 07:57:42 UTC