- From: Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:57:19 +0530
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Hello Manu, you addressed all my concerns and solved the issues. Thanks Stefan On 10 Mar 2013 at 14:06, Manu Sporny wrote: > Stefan, I'm preparing the 2nd Last Call for HTML+RDFa 1.1 and will be > responding to all of your LC comments in the next few days. Thanks again > for your great review comments. :) > > On 02/02/2013 11:22 AM, Stefan Schumacher wrote: > > In 2.1 there is still one 'Internet media type' and one 'Internet > > Media Type', I would actually vote for 'internet media type', all > > three words small. Two occurances to check. > > I changed both to "Internet Media Type" to align with RFC2046, > Wikipedia's article on Internet Media Types and various findings by the > TAG that capitalize the phrase in the same way: > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2046.txt > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt > > > In 3.1 there is still written DTD, where it should be DOCTYPE > > declaration. Comment from Shane McCarron from 31.01.2013: > > > > The document does not 'contain a DTD'. It contains a DOCTYPE > > declaration that references an XHTML+RDFa family DTD. Or something > > along those lines. > > While still there when you read the document, this was fixed before the > Last Call. > > > The new three-sentence-version of the second last list item in 3.1 > > that you wrote is very much understandable now. Well written. > > Good to hear that. :) > > > In EXAMPLE 2 in section 2.1, there is a 'schema:': @prefix schema: > > <http://schema.org/> . > > > > It is not really clear, how the RDFa processor gets the information > > to put this schema: prefix, because there is no obvious > > explanation/declaration in EXAMPLE 1. It might be declared in the > > initial context, but the innocent reader might not now. Not sure, if > > it is really necessary to add a sentence for that, just thought, > > first examples should be understandable without any questions open. > > I removed the http://schema.org/ prefix declaration and used full URLs > instead. That will probably be easier for somebody that is not familiar > with Turtle to understand. > > This addresses all of your Last Call review comments and closes: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/148 > > Please let us know if we've addressed all of your concerns, ASAP. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/ > -- Stefan Schumacher Lonavala, Maharashtra, India +91 9923670737
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 04:28:03 UTC