W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Adding QUDT to RDFa Initial Context

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:08:52 +0200
Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Péter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
Message-Id: <EBDE310A-BDA0-4D7F-996F-C01F0B50E6A3@w3.org>
To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>

the mechanism that lead to the first set has been described in


the executive summary is that there should be a proof that the given (non W3C rec defined) vocabulary is indeed widely used on the Web; we should _not_ be in position to make some sort of a qualitative judgement on the vocabularies in order to get them on the list.

If we stick to this principle then I would say qudt may be a good candidate in a few years if it really catches attention (and I am perfectly happy to say it has good chances) but not at this moment...

All that being said, we may have to think about re-running those (or similar) searches to see if anything significant has changed (or rely on some other services like LOV).



On Aug 29, 2013, at 03:00 , Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:

> I have no idea what the procedures are for adding things to the initial context [1] but I'm going to throw this one into the mix.  I would like to see prefixes for the QUDT vocabulary [2] added.
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1
> [2] http://www.qudt.org/
> -- 
> --Alex Milowski
> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
> considered."
> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics

Ivan Herman, W3C 
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 07:09:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:34 UTC