W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: RDFa parser behavior for @value in light of Issue-145

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:01:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnF-NK6LFqD0uXitwS2wsyP391BUgLCXE3Axf-MyXWvjgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Faye Harris <fayeharris@google.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>, public-rdfa-wg <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Faye Harris <fayeharris@google.com> wrote:

> OK.
>
> However, the same resolution indicates that @content should override
> @value on the element. if I run Test 286<http://rdfa.info/test-suite/test-cases/rdfa1.1/html5/0286.html>now, the new extraction should be the following instead:
>
> sub: 'http://x.com/0286.html'
> pred: 'http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#value'
> obj: 'I came, I saw, I conquered'
>
> If that's correct, then keeping and updating Test 286 would seem like a
> good idea. :)
>

I agree with Faye, we should re-introduce Test 286 and update it. Anyone
disagrees?

Steph.


>
> Thanks,
> -- Faye
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 4, 2013, at 21:40 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mar 4, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Faye Harris <fayeharris@google.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > >> The resolution of Issue-145 says that a HTML+RDFa 1.1 parser should
> not process @value. Test 286 has also been removed. Does that mean it would
> be non-conforming for a parser to process an @value attribute? If so, I'd
> recommend reinstating Test 286 as a negative test, where nothing is
> extracted.
> > >
> > > The WG has always taken the stance that a processor is free to produce
> more triples (this is why SPARQL is used to test results, rather than
> explicit triples). The removal of @value is just reflecting that HTML5 no
> longer has the <data> element with which it made sense. If you want to
> continue to process that, i don't see any issues for my part. However, this
> is just my opinion.
> > >
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> > > Gregg
> > >
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> -- Faye
> > >
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> > mobile: +31-641044153
> > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Steph.
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 14:01:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:34 UTC