- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:32:27 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Regrets. Positions below: Gregg Kellogg Sent from my iPhone On Sep 2, 2012, at 7:12 PM, "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a telecon coming up on this Thursday to start processing the > HTML+RDFa issues. We'll start with the ones that are easiest to resolve > first. > > Below is the preliminary agenda for our telecon. If you have any > additions or modifications to the agenda, please send them to the > mailing list or mention them on the telecon before we get started. > > ========== > Thursday, September 6th 2012 > Time: 1400 UTC, 7am San Francisco, 10am Boston, 3pm London > W3C Zakim bridge, telecon code: RDFA (7332) > SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org > Phone US: +1.617.761.6200 > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#rdfa > Duration: 60 minutes > Scribe: Steven, Ivan, Niklas, Manu, Gregg, Ted, Shane > ========== > > Agenda > ------ > > 1. ISSUE-140: OBJECT and @data attribute > * http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/140 +0 > 2. ISSUE-141: Datatypes for @datetime > * http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/141 +1, including element text content. > 3. ISSUE-137: Normative media types for HTML+RDFa > * http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/137 +1 > 4. ISSUE-126: Can xmlns: be reported as a warning? > * http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/126 +1 > 5. ISSUE-139: Honor xml:base in XHTML5 > * http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/139 +1 Gregg > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Which is better - RDFa Lite or Microdata? > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/mythical-differences/ >
Received on Monday, 3 September 2012 01:33:40 UTC