- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:32:11 -0500
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Egor Antonov <elderos@yandex-team.ru>
On Nov 12, 2012, at 13:40 , Gregg Kellogg wrote: [skip] > > In RDFa 1.1 Lite, you'd need to use @property and repeat both @proprty on each <a>. but I don't think @inlist is officially part of RDFa 1.1 Lite. Alas!, it is not. We tried to keep Lite to the bare minimum... > >> Looking at http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-rdfa-core-20120607/#markup-fragments-and-rdfa >> and http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-rdfa-core-20120607/#s-xml-literals >> it seems an alternate design might be possible with RDFa. Instead of >> trying to make the entire 'breadcrumb' structure explicit as a graph, >> we could put the whole breadcrumb into a single property value as a >> larger piece of markup. The current spec shows this example: >> >> <h2 property="dc:title" datatype="rdf:XMLLiteral"> >> E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time >> </h2> >> >> ...presumably this will be adjusted in the HTML+RDFa world. There was >> discussion in the RDF WG earlier this year towards HTMLLiteral or HTML >> as a datatype; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012May/0612.html >> and the latest drafts now have such a datatype: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-html >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-rdf11-concepts-20120605/#section-html >> (latest public and editor's drafts seem identical) > > Not a fan of this use case, but I believe that our intention is to support rdf:HTML in HTML+RDFa 1.1, certainly my processor does. > Yes, we agreed that rdf:HTML will be part of RDFa+HTML5. And my parser implements it, too... Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 22:32:40 UTC