public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from November 2012 by date

Wednesday, 21 November 2012

• Call for Exclusions: HTML+RDFa 1.1 Ian Jacobs

Tuesday, 20 November 2012

• Re: Prefix for http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ in RDFa Initial Context? Thomas Baker
• Re: Prefix for http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ in RDFa Initial Context? Ivan Herman
• Re: Prefix for http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ in RDFa Initial Context? Gregg Kellogg
• Prefix for http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ in RDFa Initial Context? Thomas Baker

Sunday, 18 November 2012

• 2nd CfP: Enabling Domain Experts to use Formalised Reasoning@AISB 2013 (Exeter, UK, 2-5 Apr 2013); Deadlines 10 Dec and 14 Jan Christoph LANGE

Friday, 16 November 2012

• Re: term name for prefix redefinition? Ivan Herman
• Re: term name for prefix redefinition? Shane McCarron

Thursday, 15 November 2012

• Re: term name for prefix redefinition? Niklas Lindström
• Re: term name for prefix redefinition? Gregg Kellogg
• term name for prefix redefinition? Ivan Herman

Monday, 12 November 2012

• Re: recommended pattern for markup-valued 'breadcrumb' properties in RDFa Ivan Herman
• Re: recommended pattern for markup-valued 'breadcrumb' properties in RDFa Gregg Kellogg
• recommended pattern for markup-valued 'breadcrumb' properties in RDFa Dan Brickley

Friday, 9 November 2012

• Re: Tiny issue on HTML5+RDFa vs. RDFa Lite Ivan Herman
• Re: Tiny issue on HTML5+RDFa vs. RDFa Lite Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Tiny issue on HTML5+RDFa vs. RDFa Lite Ivan Herman
• Re: Tiny issue on HTML5+RDFa vs. RDFa Lite Manu Sporny
• Re: A small addition to our last resolution... Manu Sporny

Thursday, 8 November 2012

• Re: Tiny issue on HTML5+RDFa vs. RDFa Lite Gregg Kellogg
• Re: A small addition to our last resolution... Ivan Herman
• Tiny issue on HTML5+RDFa vs. RDFa Lite Ivan Herman
• Re: A small addition to our last resolution... Gregg Kellogg
• Re: A small addition to our last resolution... Niklas Lindström
• A small addition to our last resolution... Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Sebastian Heath
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Stefan Schumacher
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Sebastian Heath
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Shane McCarron
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Simon Grant
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Shane McCarron
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Sebastian Heath
• Re: ISSUE-143 (Prefixes too complicated): Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Tab Atkins Jr.

Monday, 5 November 2012

• @itemref-like feature in RDFa+HTML5 (tracker: this is ISSUE-144) Ivan Herman
• Re: Telecon Agenda - November 8th 2012, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• Telecon Agenda - November 8th 2012, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-144 (Add @itemref-like attribute): Add an @itemref-like attribute to RDFa [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker

Last message date: Wednesday, 21 November 2012 15:29:10 UTC