- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:31:23 -0400
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
You could also return N-Triples or Turtle instead of RDF/XML. RDF/XML is pretty archaic, and it seems reasonable that we might want test cases that create results that RDF/XML can't handle. (the test harness will accept pretty much any RDF variation, as long as content-type is used properly). That said, if this particular test can be re-formulated and still preserve the purpose of the test, we should change it. Gregg Kellogg Sent from my iPad On May 18, 2012, at 12:33 AM, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > This passes the test... > > http://buzzword.org.uk/2012/rdfa-distiller/?format=turtle&url=http://rdfa.info/test-suite/test-cases/rdfa1.1/xml/0259.xml > > But this gives us an internal server error... > > http://buzzword.org.uk/2012/rdfa-distiller/?format=rdfxml&url=http://rdfa.info/test-suite/test-cases/rdfa1.1/xml/0259.xml > > Why? The output of test 0259 cannot be serialized in RDF/XML, as it > contains predicate URIs that cannot be split into qnames. > > It might be sensible to test CURIEs like property="ctag:x" rather than > just property="ctag:", or use the vocab URIs in the subject position of > each triple rather than the predicate position. > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > >
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 14:33:13 UTC