- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:06:42 -0400
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
It's important to note that the narrow change we adopted for limiting @rel when used with @property in HTML+RDFa broke exactly 0 existing test cases in the test suite. I think this is a good indication of how limited the impact of the solution is. Gregg Kellogg Sent from my iPad On May 16, 2012, at 2:18 AM, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:11:12 +0100 > Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > >> Coming to the debate a little late perhaps, but this is a really bad >> idea. > > Further the current resolution doesn't actually resolve very much. A > "junk triple" is still generated from: > > <div vocab="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" typeof="Person"> > My name is <span property="name">Toby Inkster</a> > and I have a <a href="http://tobyinkster.co.uk/" > rel="me">website</a>. > </div> > > If you want to avoid the <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/me> triple, then it > seems to me that the only real solution is to say that @vocab applies to > @typeof, @property and @datatype, but does not affect @rel or @rev at > all. But that's pretty drastic. > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> >
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 14:07:46 UTC