Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

On May 16, 2012, at 11:20 , Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:11:12 +0100
> Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Coming to the debate a little late perhaps, but this is a really bad
>> idea.
> 
> Further the current resolution doesn't actually resolve very much. A
> "junk triple" is still generated from:
> 
> 	<div vocab="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" typeof="Person">
> 	  My name is <span property="name">Toby Inkster</a>
> 	  and I have a <a href="http://tobyinkster.co.uk/"
> 	  rel="me">website</a>.
> 	</div>
> 
> If you want to avoid the <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/me> triple, then it
> seems to me that the only real solution is to say that @vocab applies to
> @typeof, @property and @datatype, but does not affect @rel or @rev at
> all. But that's pretty drastic.

Yes, that approach was also discussed... But, as you say, the group decided that this was indeed a bit too drastic.

Ivan

> 
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:38:34 UTC