- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 12:47:46 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Oh, yes, you're right. Thanks! Specifically this means that in 1.0, even if the value is given in a @content, the nested content isn't parsed for RDFa, right? So that the result would be only: <http://example.net/> rdf:value "value one" . Or does it also mean that the first value is typed as an XMLLiteral (even though it's taken from @content)? Best regards, Niklas On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > Niklas, I saw that 0292 is enabled for both RDFa 1.0 and RDFa 1.1. However, my RDFa 1.0 processor treats the property value of <a> as an XMLLiteral. In RDFa 1.0 if a @property value contains elements, it's treated as an XMLLiteral. > > I'm going to change this to be an RDFa 1.1-only test. > > Gregg >
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 10:48:46 UTC