Re: Test 0218 : empty lists

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Manu Sporny <> wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 01:29 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Gregg
>> Kellogg<>  wrote:
>>> This is implied in the previous step where it says "next item in
>>> the ‘bnode’ array or, if that does not exist,
>>>". You're right that
>>>  it's not spelled out explicitly.
>> I'm not sure I agree.  I think the specification doesn't say that
>> and I don't see it being implied.  That was certainly not the reading
>> I took when I implemented it.
> Hi Alex,
> The RDFa Core spec editor and I discussed this and have made an
> editorial change that should make this much more clear. Please see the
> change here:
> If you are happy with this change, please respond to this e-mail as soon
> as possible and let us know as we're under a very tight schedule for PR.
> We will have an official response to you after the telecon tomorrow, but
> the sooner you respond, the better. If you are not happy with the
> change, please let us know exactly why you are not and what change would
> result in a positive response from you.

Yes, this change is fine.  ...and I've implemented it as well.

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics

Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 15:44:51 UTC