Re: [editorial] RDFa Lite 1.1 needs to say what RDF and RDFa are

On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 00:09 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Hi Liam,

> I have made 3 of the 4 changes you requested. We will have an official
> response back to you after the telecon tomorrow. If you are happy with
> these changes, please respond stating that as soon as you can. If you
> don't like the changes, please be specific about why you are not happy
> with them.

I'm fine with the changes, thank you.

I'd still prefer at least an informative reference to RDF but I
understand your reasoning and I'm OK with you not adding one.

Thank you responding!


Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C,
Pictures from old books:

Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 04:46:56 UTC