Wednesday, 29 February 2012
Monday, 27 February 2012
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-131 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-129 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Re: Updated RDFa Lite 1.1 draft
- Updated RDFa Lite 1.1 draft
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-128 from RDF Web Apps WG
Sunday, 26 February 2012
- Official Response to ISSUE-132 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Official Response to ISSUE-130 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Official Response to ISSUE-131 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Official Response to ISSUE-129 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-119 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-127 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Official Response to ISSUE-128 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Official Response to ISSUE-127 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Official Response to ISSUE-119 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Re: Role Attribute Module and vocabularies
Friday, 24 February 2012
- Re: A *minor* question on default terms...
- Re: A *minor* question on default terms...
- Re: A *minor* question on default terms...
- Re: A *minor* question on default terms...
- A *minor* question on default terms...
- Re: Updated RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa drafts
- Updated RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa drafts
Thursday, 23 February 2012
- Re: ISSUE-127 (Empty Lists?): What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-127 (Empty Lists?): What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-127 (Empty Lists?): What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- [REVISED] Telecon Agenda - February 23rd 2012, 1500 UTC
Monday, 20 February 2012
- Re: ISSUE-132 (Is @src allowed everywhere?): Is the @src attribute defined in RDFa Core allowed on any element? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-132 (Is @src allowed everywhere?): Is the @src attribute defined in RDFa Core allowed on any element? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-132 (Is @src allowed everywhere?): Is the @src attribute defined in RDFa Core allowed on any element? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-132 (Is @src allowed everywhere?): Is the @src attribute defined in RDFa Core allowed on any element? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-132 (Is @src allowed everywhere?): Is the @src attribute defined in RDFa Core allowed on any element? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-132 (Is @src allowed everywhere?): Is the @src attribute defined in RDFa Core allowed on any element? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: Telecon Agenda - February 23rd 2012, 1500 UTC
- Re: ISSUE-130 (HREF, REL and REV everywhere): Disallow href, rel, and rev on elements in host languages that do not allow it [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-132 (Is @src allowed everywhere?): Is the @src attribute defined in RDFa Core allowed on any element? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Telecon Agenda - February 23rd 2012, 1500 UTC
- ISSUE-132 (Is @src allowed everywhere?): Is the @src attribute defined in RDFa Core allowed on any element? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- ISSUE-131 (@href overrides @content): Specification bug where @href accidentally overrides @content [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- ISSUE-130 (HREF, REL and REV everywhere): Disallow href, rel, and rev on elements in host languages that do not allow it [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
Saturday, 18 February 2012
Friday, 17 February 2012
- Re: Confused by combining @href and @content
- Re: Crawl of RDFa/Microdata/Microformats
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Confused by combining @href and @content
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
- Re: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129)
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Fwd: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129)
Monday, 13 February 2012
- Re: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129)
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129)
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Re: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129)
- Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129)
- ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Regarding @vocab and terms
Thursday, 9 February 2012
- small housekeeping on the RDFa tracker
- ISSUE-128 (empty list of TERMorCURIEorAbsIRIs): Empty list of TERMorCURIEorAbsIRIs should be allowed more explicitly in the spec [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- ISSUE-127 (Empty Lists?): What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core]
- Fwd: Hanging @property
- Re: Test suite updates
- Test suite updates
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
- Re: Test #0198 is invalid in RDFa 1.1
- Re: Change is required for test #0058
- On test #218: is this what we want?
- Test #0198 is invalid in RDFa 1.1
- Change is required for the tests 0081 and 0082 (Re: Change is required for the test #0078)
- Change is required for the test #0078
- Change is required for test #0058
Monday, 6 February 2012
Thursday, 2 February 2012
Wednesday, 1 February 2012
Thursday, 2 February 2012
- Fwd: In case you were not on IRC...
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-108 from RDF Web Apps WG
- Re: Telecon Agenda - February 2nd 2012, 1500 UTC