- From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:21:56 -0600
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reGzmj0nWDm5CrtF5d8_x3AscmBnjZRQFfmZuKbujyxT_g@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > +1. This is an oversight. > > Ivan > > --- > Ivan Herman > Tel:+31 641044153 > http://www.ivan-herman.net > > (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) > > > > On 26 Dec 2012, at 18:45, "RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker" < > sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > > ISSUE-146 (HTML5 head/body): HTML5+RDFa needs rule for implied @about="" > on head/body [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] > > > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/146 > > > > Raised by: Gregg Kellogg > > On product: RDFa 1.1 in HTML5 > > > > XHTML+RDFa has the following clauses for Step 5 and Step 6 to act as if > there is an implied @about="" on head and body elements: > > > > In section 7.5, processing step 5, if no IRI is provided by a resource > attribute (e.g., @about, @href, @resource, or @src), then first check to > see if the element is the head or body element. If it is, then act as if > the new subject is set to the parent object. > > In section 7.5, processing step 6, if no IRI is provided by a resource > attribute (e.g., @about, @href, @resource, or @src), then first check to > see if the element is the head or body element. If it is, then act as if > the new subject is set to the parent object. > > > > These rules are missing from HTML5+RDFa; I presume that these are > intended there as well, but were left out due to an oversight. Test 0066 > tests for this, and would fail for HTML5/XHTML5 otherwise. > > > > > > > > -- Shane P. McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 27 December 2012 01:22:29 UTC