public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from November 2011 by date

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Telecon Agenda - December 1st 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Monday, 28 November 2011

Mixing-up Semantic Data with HTML Rendering landong zuo
Re: Would RDFa support Named Graph ? landong zuo
RDFa Lite - New publication-ready First Public Working Draft Manu Sporny

Sunday, 27 November 2011

Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Niklas Lindström
Re: Updated the Primer Niklas Lindström

Friday, 25 November 2011

Re: Would RDFa support Named Graph ? Ivan Herman

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Would RDFa support Named Graph ? landong zuo
RE: <time> values in HTML5 Robert Leif
Re: JSON-LD and the RDFa distiller Ivan Herman
Re: JSON-LD and the RDFa distiller Gregg Kellogg
JSON-LD and the RDFa distiller Ivan Herman
Closure of ISSUE-113, based on your Last Call comments Ivan Herman
Looking at HTML Literal Gregg Kellogg

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

Re: Default Vocabulary for datatype: datatypeLibrary attribute Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Re: Default Vocabulary for datatype: datatypeLibrary attribute Jeni Tennison
Default Vocabulary for datatype: datatypeLibrary attribute Dominik Tomaszuk
Re: <time> values in HTML5 John Cowan
Re: <time> values in HTML5 Liam R E Quin
Re: <time> values in HTML5 John Cowan
My opinions on the remaining issues (ISSUE-108, ISSUE-114, ISSUE-115, ISSUE-117, ISSUE-119, ISSUE-121) Ivan Herman
Re: Traces of RDFa profiles remain in rdfa-core Ivan Herman
Re: Traces of RDFa profiles remain in rdfa-core Stéphane Corlosquet
Re: Traces of RDFa profiles remain in rdfa-core Stéphane Corlosquet
Re: Traces of RDFa profiles remain in rdfa-core Ivan Herman
Traces of RDFa profiles remain in rdfa-core Stéphane Corlosquet
Re: <time> values in HTML5 Liam R E Quin
Re: Last call comment admin: resolution of ISSUE-97 Stéphane Corlosquet
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE (ISSUE-118) Ivan Herman
Closure of ISSUE-116, based on your Last Call comments Ivan Herman
Last call comment admin: resolution of ISSUE-97 Ivan Herman
Re: Plan of action / this weeks telco cancelled Ivan Herman
Re: <time> values in HTML5 John Cowan

Monday, 21 November 2011

Plan of action / this weeks telco cancelled Manu Sporny
Re: <time> values in HTML5 Tantek Çelik
Re: <time> values in HTML5 Julian Reschke
Re: <time> values in HTML5 Tantek Çelik
Re: <time> values in HTML5 John Cowan

Sunday, 20 November 2011

Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Mark Birbeck
Re: ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa Jonathan Rees
Re: ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa (ISSUE-121) Sebastian Heath
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Mark Birbeck
Re: ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa (ISSUE-121) Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa Ivan Herman
ISSUE-121: Using @id to set subject in RDFa [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 19 November 2011

Re: ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa Toby Inkster
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman
ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa Sebastian Heath
Re: <time> values in HTML5 Jeni Tennison
Re: <time> values in HTML5 Liam R E Quin
Re: <time> values in HTML5 Gregg Kellogg
<time> values in HTML5 Jeni Tennison

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118 Shane McCarron
on the OWL terms Ivan Herman
Updated the Src file for the RDFa Core, implementing the resolution on ISSUE-116 Ivan Herman
ISSUE-120: This would mean adding to the current set of terms owl:equivalentProperty and owl:equivalentClass. RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Using @resource instead of @about in RDFa Lite Ben Adida
Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 Niklas Lindström
Re: Using @resource instead of @about in RDFa Lite (ISSUE-119) Ivan Herman
Re: Using @resource instead of @about in RDFa Lite Gregg Kellogg
Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Niklas Lindström
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a term (not CURIE!) Ivan Herman
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a term (not CURIE!) Niklas Lindström
Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 Ivan Herman
Fwd: Using @resource instead of @about in RDFa Lite (ISSUE-119) Ivan Herman
ISSUE-119 (lite-resource): Should we concider adding @resource to RDFa Lite and drop @about instead? [RDFa 1.1 Lite] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Using @resource instead of @about in RDFa Lite Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

Re: Using @resource instead of @about in RDFa Lite Jeni Tennison
Using @resource instead of @about in RDFa Lite Niklas Lindström
Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 Jeni Tennison
Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 Gregg Kellogg
On the meeting of *next week* Ivan Herman
Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 Steven Pemberton
Fwd: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison (relevant to ISSUE-114) Ivan Herman
Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 Ivan Herman
Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 Ivan Herman
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a term (not CURIE!) Gregg Kellogg
ISSUE-118 (term syntax): Should we consider allowing the '/' character in a term [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a term (not CURIE!) Ivan Herman
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a term (not CURIE!) Shane McCarron
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a term (not CURIE!) Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Toby Inkster
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE Toby Inkster
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Toby Inkster
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE Ivan Herman
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE Ivan Herman
Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Toby Inkster
Just checking out where we are with RDFa issues Ivan Herman
ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-116 (vocab-owl): Consider owl terms for vocab expansion [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 14 November 2011

Sunday, 13 November 2011

Re: Web Crawl Regexes for RDFa Stéphane Corlosquet
Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Toby Inkster
Thank you for the detailed documentation Cindy Lewis
Re: Web Crawl Regexes for RDFa Niklas Lindström
Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Niklas Lindström
Re: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats) (ISSUE-108) Ivan Herman
Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Ivan Herman
Re: Behavior of @property with @typeof and incomplete triples Ivan Herman

Saturday, 12 November 2011

Re: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats) Jeni Tennison
Fwd: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats) Gregg Kellogg
Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Toby Inkster
Re: Behavior of @property with @typeof and incomplete triples Gregg Kellogg
Re: Behavior of @property with @typeof and incomplete triples Ivan Herman

Friday, 11 November 2011

Re: Behavior of @property with @typeof and incomplete triples Gregg Kellogg
Behavior of @property with @typeof and incomplete triples Gregg Kellogg
schema.org and rdfa 1.1 Ivan Herman
Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Shane McCarron
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Ivan Herman
Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Ivan Herman
Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Niklas Lindström
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Gregg Kellogg
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Niklas Lindström
Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Ivan Herman
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Jeni Tennison
Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary Shane McCarron
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Ivan Herman
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Jeni Tennison
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Niklas Lindström
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Ivan Herman
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Toby Inkster
Updated the Primer Ivan Herman
RDFa 1.1 Core updated Ivan Herman
Re: Telecon Agenda - November 10th 2011, 1400 UTC Steven Pemberton
Re: @rel and @property symmetry Ivan Herman
Admin issue on publication vs. charter Ivan Herman

Thursday, 10 November 2011

Re: @rel and @property symmetry Shane McCarron
@rel and @property symmetry Jeni Tennison
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Jeni Tennison
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Felix Sasaki
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Ivan Herman
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Shane McCarron
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Niklas Lindström
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Felix Sasaki
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Ivan Herman
Fwd: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats) Ivan Herman
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Gregg Kellogg
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Shane McCarron
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Gregg Kellogg
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Ivan Herman
Re: Telecon Agenda - November 10th 2011, 1400 UTC Ivan Herman
Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Shane McCarron
Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) Ivan Herman
Re: Telecon Agenda - November 10th 2011, 1400 UTC Toby Inkster

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

Telecon Agenda - November 10th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny
Diagram on processing Ivan Herman
Small comment on RDFa: @content and <meta>? Ivan Herman
The current technical proposals to answer to the schema.org related issues on RDFa 1.1 Ivan Herman
Re: Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) (ACTION-102) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

Re: Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) (ACTION-102) Gregg Kellogg
Web Crawl Regexes for RDFa Manu Sporny

Monday, 7 November 2011

Re: Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) (ACTION-102) Ivan Herman

Sunday, 6 November 2011

Re: Linking to @about in RDFa Lite? (ISSUE-115) Ivan Herman
ISSUE-115 (fragid explanation): Explanation on the Fragment ID in @about may be misleading [RDFa 1.1 Lite] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 5 November 2011

Re: Linking to @about in RDFa Lite? Sebastian Heath
Non-serious comparison of RDFa 1.1 and 1.0... Ivan Herman

Friday, 4 November 2011

We may have a <date> element for HTML5 after all... Ivan Herman
Re: Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) (ACTION-102) Ivan Herman
Re: Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) (ACTION-102) Gregg Kellogg
Re: Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) (ACTION-102) Ivan Herman

Thursday, 3 November 2011

Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) Gregg Kellogg
New editors' draft for core Ivan Herman
Fwd: URL/URI/IRI resolution in HTML5/RDF/RDFa Jeni Tennison
Re: Telecon Agenda - November 3rd 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny
Re: Telecon Agenda - November 3rd 2011, 1400 UTC Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

Re: FYI: W3C editor's draft for RDFa 1.1 Lite Alex Milowski
Re: Linking to @about in RDFa Lite? Ivan Herman
Re: Linking to @about in RDFa Lite? Sebastian Heath
Re: Linking to @about in RDFa Lite? Toby Inkster
Re: Change on typeof? (Was Re: The processing rules for property/rel) Ivan Herman
Re: Linking to @about in RDFa Lite? Ivan Herman
Telecon Agenda - November 3rd 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 1 November 2011

ISSUE-114 (HTML5 @href as URL): HTML5 content model for @href/@src coerces values to URLs [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Change on typeof? (Was Re: The processing rules for property/rel) Ivan Herman
Re: Change on typeof? (Was Re: The processing rules for property/rel) Gregg Kellogg
Re: The processing rules for property/rel Ivan Herman
Re: Change on typeof? (Was Re: The processing rules for property/rel) Ivan Herman
Re: The processing rules for property/rel Toby Inkster
Change on typeof? (Was Re: The processing rules for property/rel) Ivan Herman
Re: The processing rules for property/rel Ivan Herman

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 November 2011 03:37:00 UTC