- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 17:16:53 +0100
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- CC: RDF Web Applications Working Group WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi Niklas (all), Here's the details, RDFNode is the base interface of NamedNode, BlankNode and Literal, each of those have a "value" of some kind - with NamedNode, the value is an IRI, but this could be either a string, or say an instance of an IRI Class - so it must have the type any, in effect 'name' would be the ideal attribute name - with BlankNode, the value is something to hook on to as a reference, this could be anything, an integer/number, a string, some instance of a unique has class, whatever - so again it must have the type any, and the ideal name would probably be something like 'reference' - with Literal, the value is the lexical representation of the node/term, so "19.00" is different to "19.0" and "19." - this value is limited to being a DOMString and required for RDF equivalence (without D-entailments or native value translation, which are separate things). the ideal name would probably be 'lexicalValue' or 'representation' or something like that. For the time being we've opted for 'nominalValue' just to get something un-offensive in there for the FPWD, but any ideas on a name for the attribute which covers all 3 of the uses above would be great :) ps: you give some great contributions to the group Niklas, ever considered joining? Best, Nathan Niklas Lindström wrote: > Is this the lexical or native value of an RDF node (term)? > > If so, lexicalValue or nativeValue comes to mind. ;) > > Or something like 'repr' (inspired by Python's repr function, which > "Return the canonical string representation of the object"). > > Best regards, > Niklas > > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:36 PM, RDF Web Applications Working Group > Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> ISSUE-95: Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode >> >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/95 >> >> Raised by: >> On product: >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 16:18:06 UTC