- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 12:42:19 -0700
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On 5/3/2011 11:26 AM, Nathan wrote: > Ivan Herman wrote: >> On May 3, 2011, at 18:30 , Nathan wrote: >>> A couple of issues to touch on: > > Next up.. having some collisions on reserved words in languages: > > - import, have talked it through with a few people and currently > thinking addAll is about the best alternative (overloaded on graph to > accept a sequence/array of triples too, which is nice), another > alternative 'extend' : +/-? Prototype and jQuery both use 'extend' in a way that isn't really consistent with this use. So it might be confusing for those people. addAll seems less confusing (to me). > > - property, Triple.property, turns out it's heavily used in some > languages too, Ivan you'll recognize from python (?) proposal is > either 'predicate' -or- i quite like the idea of having Triple.s,p,o > instead, do we need to be verbose? I would provide aliases for both... > > - RDFNode.value - still unsure.. > > > and a different issue: > > can graph.match return a sequence of triples rather than a Graph? > basically so it's lighter, especially w/ indexed graph > implementations. My personal gut instinct is to keep the return type > of Graph to prevent unexpected functionality, and since pretty much > half the time you want a quick sequence to output or suchlike, and the > other half of the time you want a Graph to keep on using for some > purpose. > > trying to nail as many as these minors before FPWD as possible! > > Best, > > Nathan -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 19:42:43 UTC