- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 19:58:04 +0200
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On May 3, 2011, at 18:30 , Nathan wrote: > Hi All, > > A couple of issues to touch on: > > - we currently use the definition of CURIE, but we need to support all kinds, qname, curie, the latest changes as per the RDF WG - so what do we call it and define it as? > I would like to understand what really the differences/options are. Can you help out? > - createNamedNode currently accepts a string-IRI, CURIE or Term, however there are some ambiguities possible with that (as we know), in my implementation I've defined it as accepting a string IRI only, should we make the spec match? (I can't think of a reason not to, can you?) > I think accepting only a IRI is fine. If somebody wants to play, one can always use a resolve before passing on the argument to createNamedNode I. > Best, > > Nathan > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 17:56:47 UTC