Tuesday, 31 May 2011
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-87: IRIs vs URI References
- Telecon Agenda - June 2nd 2011, 1400 UTC
Monday, 30 May 2011
- Re: Regrets for 2 July
- Regrets for 2 July
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-94: Formulation on fragid in RDFa Core
Sunday, 29 May 2011
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-94: Formulation on fragid in RDFa Core
- Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-94: Formulation on fragid in RDFa Core
- Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-94: Formulation on fragid in RDFa Core
Saturday, 28 May 2011
- Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-89: 'term' vs. 'alias'
- Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-87: IRIs vs URI References
- Si compras en feria, ¡te llevas la cocina!
- Re: Need an authoritative basetype that means 'anyIRI'.
- Re: Need an authoritative basetype that means 'anyIRI'.
- Re: Need an authoritative basetype that means 'anyIRI'.
- Re: Need an authoritative basetype that means 'anyIRI'.
- Re: RDFa Core work in progress
Friday, 27 May 2011
- Re: RDFa Core work in progress
- RDFa Core work in progress
- Need an authoritative basetype that means 'anyIRI'.
- Re: ACTION-79 discussion on URI vs. IRI in the specs
Thursday, 26 May 2011
- Re: Introduction
- Re: ACTION-79 discussion on URI vs. IRI in the specs
- Introduction
- Re: ACTION-79 discussion on URI vs. IRI in the specs
- Re: ACTION-79 discussion on URI vs. IRI in the specs
- Re: ACTION-79 discussion on URI vs. IRI in the specs
- Re: ACTION-79 discussion on URI vs. IRI in the specs
- ACTION-79 discussion on URI vs. IRI in the specs
- Telecon Agenda - May 26th 2011, 1400 UTC
Wednesday, 25 May 2011
Thursday, 19 May 2011
- Re: Telecon Agenda - May 19th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - May 19th 2011, 1400 UTC
- IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa
Wednesday, 18 May 2011
Sunday, 15 May 2011
Saturday, 14 May 2011
Thursday, 12 May 2011
- RDF Web Apps WG telecon minutes for 2011-05-12
- Re: Telecon Agenda - May 12th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: Committed a cleaned version of RDF-API
- Re: Committed a cleaned version of RDF-API
- Re: Committed a cleaned version of RDF-API
- Re: Committed a cleaned version of RDF-API
- Re: Committed a cleaned version of RDF-API
Wednesday, 11 May 2011
- RDF Web Apps WG telecon minutes for 2011-05-05
- Telecon Agenda - May 12th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Committed a cleaned version of RDF-API
- Re: A minor beautifying issue/proposal on the interfaces
- A minor beautifying issue/proposal on the interfaces
- Comments on the DataParser interface in the RDF Interfaces doc
- Re: Small remarks on TermMap and PrefixMap in the RDF Interfaces document
- Re: Small remarks on TermMap and PrefixMap in the RDF Interfaces document
- Small remarks on TermMap and PrefixMap in the RDF Interfaces document
- Re: Mechanism to turn invited experts into bona-fide members?
- Mechanism to turn invited experts into bona-fide members?
Tuesday, 10 May 2011
Monday, 9 May 2011
Friday, 6 May 2011
Thursday, 5 May 2011
- Re: ISSUE-95: Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode
- Re: ISSUE-95: Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode
- ISSUE-95: Figure out a word to use when referring to the 'value' of a RDFNode
- Re: Telecon Agenda - May 5th 2011, 1400 UTC
Wednesday, 4 May 2011
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
- Re: [RDF Interfaces] names for things
- [RDF Interfaces] names for things
- Re: [RDF Interfaces] CURIEs + createNamedNode and curies/qnames/terms
- Re: [RDF Interfaces] CURIEs + createNamedNode and curies/qnames/terms
- [RDF Interfaces] CURIEs + createNamedNode and curies/qnames/terms
- RDF Interfaces, implementation
- Re: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Telecon Agenda - May 5th 2011, 1400 UTC
Monday, 2 May 2011
- Re: Possible choice for the RDFa default profile prefixes
- Re: Possible choice for the RDFa default profile prefixes
- Re: Possible choice for the RDFa default profile prefixes
- Re: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: Possible choice for the RDFa default profile prefixes
- Re: Possible choice for the RDFa default profile prefixes
- Re: Re 2: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: Re 2: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: Re 2: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: Re 2: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: Re 2: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re 2: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Possible choice for the RDFa default profile prefixes
Sunday, 1 May 2011
- RDF Interfaces - new draft
- Re: RDF Interfaces - equality, entailment, problems
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: RDF Interfaces - equality, entailment, problems
- Re: RDF Interfaces - equality, entailment, problems
- Re: RDF Interfaces - equality, entailment, problems
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- Re: RDF Interfaces - equality, entailment, problems
- Re: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions
- RDF Interfaces - equality, entailment, problems