W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2011

2nd Last Call for RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:09:26 -0400
Message-ID: <4D949926.2060008@digitalbazaar.com>
To: W3C Chairs <chairs@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, SVG WG <www-svg@w3.org>
Chairs and RDFa-savvy Working Groups,

(1) This is a 2nd Last Call Working Draft Transition Announcement for
the following Recommendation Track specifications: RDFa Core 1.1 and

(2) Document Titles and URIs

* RDFa Core 1.1
* XTHML+RDFa 1.1

(3) Instructions for providing feedback

The following documents are W3C Working Draft versions of the RDFa Core
1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 specifications that incorporate changes made as a
result of comments received during the first Last Call period. Both the
RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 documents were widely reviewed during
the extended First Last Call period. The RDFa Working Group has made a
number of non-editorial improvements and clarifications as a result. The
Working Group believes that all comments received during the last review
have been addressed.

RDFa Core 1.1 changes since 1st Last Call:

XHTML+RDFa 1.1 changes since 1st Last Call:

If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send them
to public-rdfa-wg@w3.org.

(4) Review end date

The W3C Membership and other interested parties are invited to review
the document and send comments through 21 April 2011.

(5) A reference to the group's decision to make this transition

The decision to make the transition was made after every 1st Last Call
ISSUE filed against RDFa 1.1 had been addressed:

RDFa Core 1.1 1st Last Call issues:

XHTML+RDFa 1.1 1st Last Call issues:

The motion to enter 2nd Last Call was initially made on:


A last-minute spec bug was discovered, fixed, and a second motion to
transition to 2nd Last Call was recorded here:


(6) Evidence that the document satisfies the group's requirements.

The RDFa Working Group believes that these specifications satisfy the
relevant requirements of the Working Group's charter located here:


(7) The names of groups with dependencies, explicitly inviting review
from them.

The following groups are requested to review the documents that are a
part of this transition announcement:

* Resource Description Format Working Group
* Semantic Web Coordination Group
* Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group (SVG)
* HyperText Markup Language (HTML) Working Group
* Protocols and Formats Working Group

(8) Report of any Formal Objections

The RDFa Working Group received no Formal Objection during the
preparation of this specification.

(9) Patent Disclosure Page Link can be found at


This Transition Announcement has been prepared according to the
guidelines concerning such announcements at


On behalf of the RDFa Working Group,

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Payment Standards and Competition
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:12:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:24 UTC