- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:55:58 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Yes, I am happy with the changes, too. Thank you. Ivan ---- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net On 10 Mar 2011, at 06:12, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 03/09/2011 11:52 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: >> Thanks for your Last Call comment suggesting that we integrate a basic >> XML+RDFa profile. The working group debated the concept, and has >> integrated an XML+RDFa document type and profile into RDFa Core 1.1. >> You can see an Editor's Draft that reflects these changes at >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2011/ED-rdfa-core-20110306/ >> >> Please respond and confirm your acceptance of the changes. > > Thanks for the response Shane. I think I messed up and should have put > Ivan down as the originator of that issue in the tracker: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-01-06#XHTML_Profile_document_changes__2f_management > > Although, reading back through the minutes - it's confusing who should > respond. So, I'll just say: I'm fine with the changes - great work team > RDFa! > > Ivan, if you could respond and let us know if you're good with the > changes as well, we can close this issue. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce > http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/ >
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 05:54:14 UTC