- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:31:13 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
[08:19] -->| bergie (~bergie@suvilahti.nemein.net) has joined #json-ld [08:19] <bergie> hi [08:20] <bergie> I wrote yesterday a RDFa to JSON-LD (and back) parser [08:20] <manu1> awesome! is it posted to github yet? [08:21] <manu1> We also have our own internal RDFa -> JSON-LD parser... [08:21] <manu1> we're probably going to have to put up a test suite soon [08:23] <bergie> manu1: https://github.com/bergie/VIE [08:23] <bergie> MIT license, has bunch of nodeunit tests in https://github.com/bergie/VIE/blob/master/test/rdfa.js [08:23] <bergie> with VIE you can either do RDFa->JSONLD->RDFa or also JSONLD->Backbone->JSONLD [08:24] <bergie> runs on both browser and CommonJS [08:24] <manu1> that is fantastic, bergie! very excited about the work you're doing! [08:25] <manu1> If you didn't know, JSON-LD is one of the inputs to the RDF Working Group (concerning their serialization of RDF in JSON) [08:25] <bergie> the basic idea we started with was http://bergie.iki.fi/blog/decoupling_content_management/ [08:25] <bergie> manu1: yep. JSON-LD seemed like the cleanest serialization format to work with [08:25] <manu1> so, if you have an implementation and we have an implementation, that's all you need for a world standard to make it through the Candidate Recommendation phase (they need two interoperable implementations) [08:26] <bergie> easy enough that we don't scare the CMS implementers with "too much semantics" ;-) [08:26] <manu1> bergie, that's good to know - the group is currently having a difficult time figuring out exactly what RDF in JSON should be [08:26] <manu1> so having implementation guidance from someone like you would be very helpful -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 13:31:43 UTC