W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: RDFa Last Call responses

From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:53:52 +0100
To: "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: "RDFa WG" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vr2lrff3smjzpq@steven-750g>
That's exactly what I suggested, so I thoroughly agree!

Thanks.

Steven

On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 05:12:24 +0100, Manu Sporny  
<msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> Hi Steven,
>
> As you know, the RDFa WG is in the process of preparing for a 2nd Last
> Call and I'd like to verify that you find the resolution to the
> following issue acceptable:
>
> ISSUE-82: Can RDFa attributes be namespaced?
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/82
>
> We resolved the following:
>
> """
> The RDFa Core spec, in the XML+RDFa section should suggest that RDFa
> attributes are placed into the null namespace. Host Languages are
> allowed to place the RDFa attributes into a different namespace.
> """
>
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-02-14#resolution_2
>
> The latest RDFa Core 1.1 specification has been updated to reflect that
> resolution. Could you please reply and let us know whether or not you
> feel that the RDFa WG has considered your input and whether or not you
> are satisfied with the outcome. If you are not satisfied, please let us
> know if you plan to re-raise any issues during the 2nd Last Call.
>
> -- manu
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 09:54:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:51 UTC