- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:26:56 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
I think I actually suggested this, but on further thought, it limits some important use cases. In the structured-data linter, the snippet output is generates with RDFa markup within a div inside the document. Having to declare @prefix definitions in the head is a little problematic, and doesn't keep all the example RDFa in one place; it actually introduces a different copy/paste problem. Gregg Kellogg Sent from my iPhone On Jul 18, 2011, at 7:54 PM, "Manu Sporny" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > This proposal was raised during the telecon last week[1]. Since document > authors can declare @prefix anywhere in the document, they could > introduce authoring mistakes due to copy-paste. That is, if they do not > pay attention to where the @prefix is declared, they may accidentally > attempt to express triples that do not have a CURIE prefix defined. > > While a number of people in the group feel that copy-paste issues are > not really that prevalent, limiting the use of @prefix to just the root > element of the document may decrease the possibility of copy-paste > errors. That is, copying from one place to another place in the document > would not be affected by @prefix declaration. > > The down-side to this is that all Web page authors do not have access to > the root element in a document, which is typically set by the content > management system. This would disallow people that know what they're > doing from expressing triples in their sub-sections of the document - > such as blog articles or comment posts. > > PROPOSAL: Limit @prefix declaration to the root element in the document. > > -- manu > > [1]http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-07-14#ISSUE__2d_96__3a__Document_not_ready > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm Developer Tools and Demo Released > http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/05/05/payswarm-sandbox/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 03:27:51 UTC