- From: RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:27:02 +0000
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-73 (RDFa Profile management): The RDFa WG needs to determine how each RDFa Profile document is managed [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/73 Raised by: Manu Sporny On product: LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1 Based on a discussion in the RDFa WG telecon today: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-01-06#XHTML_Profile_document_changes__2f_management The RDFa WG needs to determine how each RDFa Profile document is managed. One management proposal was provided by Toby: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Dec/0054.html Another option is to create the XML+RDFa and XHTML+RDFa Profile documents and freeze them when the first specification that they're associated with goes to REC. Note the XHTML Profile document is associated with XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and HTML+RDFa - it would be frozen when XHTML+RDFa 1.1 goes to REC. The RDFa WG should be careful to ensure that the management proposal doesn't block RDFa Core and XHTML+RDFa from going to REC.
Received on Thursday, 6 January 2011 17:27:04 UTC