public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from January 2011 by date

Monday, 31 January 2011

• Re: Tomorrow: RDFa LC Super-session 1500UTC Ivan Herman
• For tomorrow's super session ( on ISSUE-78 and ISSUE-73 ) Ivan Herman
• Re: Some further thoughts on the default profile issue ( ISSUE-78 and ISSUE-73 ) Ivan Herman
• Re: Some further thoughts on the default profile issue ( ISSUE-78 and ISSUE-73 ) Toby Inkster
• Re: Tomorrow: RDFa LC Super-session 1500UTC Ivan Herman
• Tomorrow: RDFa LC Super-session 1500UTC Manu Sporny
• Some further thoughts on the default profile issue ( ISSUE-78 and ISSUE-73 ) Ivan Herman

Sunday, 30 January 2011

• Re: Writeup of yesterday's discussion on RDFa default profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: WebID-ISSUE-11: define an inverse of cert:identity Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF API: fusing TermMap and PrefixMap Mark Birbeck
• [Fwd: Re: WebID-ISSUE-11 (bblfish): define an inverse of cert:identity [ontologies]] Nathan
• Re: Writeup of yesterday's discussion on RDFa default profiles Mark Birbeck

Friday, 28 January 2011

• Writeup of yesterday's discussion on RDFa default profiles Ivan Herman
• Small issue around the one default profile Ivan Herman

Thursday, 27 January 2011

• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-01-27 Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF/RDFa API: Structuring graph data Manu Sporny
• Regrets for today Nathan
• Re: RDF/RDFa API: Structuring graph data Nathan
• ISSUE-76 Triage Nathan

Wednesday, 26 January 2011

• Number of default profile files? (ISSUE-78 ISSUE-73 ISSUE-69) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 25 January 2011

• ISSUE-74 triage Toby Inkster
• ISSUE-67 triage Toby Inkster
• DRAFT review of XHTML Role Attribute Module Toby Inkster
• Telecon Agenda - January 28th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Sunday, 23 January 2011

• ISSUE-71: DRAFT Last Call response to Shelley Powers Manu Sporny

Saturday, 22 January 2011

• RDF/RDFa API: Structuring graph data Manu Sporny

Friday, 21 January 2011

• Re: HTML+RDFa issue 120 Ivan Herman
• HTML+RDFa issue 120 Toby Inkster
• Re: Proposal on ISSUE-72: What should we do about a generic XML+RDFa grammar? Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-81: Make declarative definition normative, procedural definition informative. Triage of Issue 75 - Part 3 [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-80: Editorial - Integrate attribute information. Triage of Issue 75 - Part 2 [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-79: Editorial - Integrate CURIE information. Triage of Issue 75 - Part 1 [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Proposal on ISSUE-72: What should we do about a generic XML+RDFa grammar? Shane McCarron
• Re: "Triage" of ISSUE-69 Ivan Herman
• Re: Thoughts on RDFa from Twitter Melvin Carvalho
• Re: "Triage" of ISSUE-69 Toby Inkster
• Re: Thoughts on RDFa from Twitter Nathan
• "Triage" of ISSUE-69 Ivan Herman
• Default subject (part of your last call comment, ISSUE-77) Ivan Herman
• Re: Thoughts on RDFa from Twitter Nathan
• Triage of Harry's LC comment Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-78 (Default Prefixes and Terms - Harry Halpin): Should we have default prefixes and terms for host languages [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-77 (Adding a default subject - Harry Halpin): Adding in extra blank node default subjects [RDFa 1.1 Core] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Thoughts on RDFa from Twitter Mark Birbeck
• Re: Thoughts on RDFa from Twitter Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal on ISSUE-72: What should we do about a generic XML+RDFa grammar? Ivan Herman
• Proposal on ISSUE-72: What should we do about a generic XML+RDFa grammar? Shane McCarron
• Thoughts on RDFa from Twitter Manu Sporny

Thursday, 20 January 2011

• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-01-20 Manu Sporny
• Re: URI/IRI Normalization in RDFa environments Julian Reschke
• Re: URI/IRI Normalization in RDFa environments Nathan
• Re: URI/IRI Normalization in RDFa environments Ivan Herman
• Possible policy for default prefixes and terms (relevant for ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-64) Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 19 January 2011

• Re: CURIEs: cite RDFa Core or CURIE WG Note? Christoph LANGE
• URI/IRI Normalization in RDFa environments Nathan
• Re: CURIEs: cite RDFa Core or CURIE WG Note? Shane McCarron
• Re: CURIEs: cite RDFa Core or CURIE WG Note? Christoph LANGE
• Re: CURIEs: cite RDFa Core or CURIE WG Note? Shane McCarron
• CURIEs: cite RDFa Core or CURIE WG Note? Christoph LANGE
• RDF API: fusing TermMap and PrefixMap Benjamin Adrian

Tuesday, 18 January 2011

• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Toby Inkster
• Re: LC comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Michael Hausenblas
• Re: LC comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Ivan Herman
• Re: LC comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Shane McCarron
• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Andy Seaborne
• Re: IRI Normalization in the RDF-API Ivan Herman

Monday, 17 January 2011

• Telecon Agenda - January 20th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny
• IRI Normalization in the RDF-API Nathan
• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Nathan
• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Nathan
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-64: Add rel=describedby to the XHTML vocab Toby Inkster
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-60: XMLLiteral context preservation Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Ivan Herman
• Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-62: @prefix processing order Ivan Herman
• Last Call Response to ISSUE-64: Add rel=describedby to the XHTML vocab Manu Sporny
• Last Call Response to ISSUE-62: @prefix processing order Manu Sporny
• Last Call Response to ISSUE-60: XMLLiteral context preservation Manu Sporny

Sunday, 16 January 2011

• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Andy Seaborne

Friday, 14 January 2011

• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Nathan
• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Ivan Herman

Thursday, 13 January 2011

• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-01-13 Manu Sporny
• Re: Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Nathan
• Re: Telecon Agenda - January 13th 2011, 1400 UTC Mark Birbeck
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Ivan Herman
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Nathan
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Ivan Herman
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Nathan
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Ivan Herman
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Nathan
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Ivan Herman
• Generalized triples (Fwd: Non-Javascript RDF API-s?) Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-76 (Core - Jeni Tennison 4): RDFa Profiles [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-75 (Core - Jeni Tennison 3): Specification Structure [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-74 (Core - Jeni Tennison 2): Host Language Conformance [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Manu Sporny
• Re: Modularity objection to PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61 Manu Sporny

Wednesday, 12 January 2011

• Comments on the RDFa API Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF API thoughts Ivan Herman
• New HTML+RDFa 1.1 Working Draft published Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 11 January 2011

• Re: RDF API thoughts Toby Inkster
• Re: RDF API thoughts Nathan
• Re: RDF API thoughts Simon Reinhardt
• Re: RDF API thoughts Nathan
• Re: RDF API thoughts Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF API thoughts Nathan
• Re: RDF API thoughts Ivan Herman
• RDF API thoughts Toby Inkster
• Re: Telecon Agenda - January 13th 2011, 1400 UTC Toby Inkster
• Telecon Agenda - January 13th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Friday, 7 January 2011

• Re: ISSUE-73 (RDFa Profile management): The RDFa WG needs to determine how each RDFa Profile document is managed [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] Ivan Herman

Thursday, 6 January 2011

• ISSUE-73 (RDFa Profile management): The RDFa WG needs to determine how each RDFa Profile document is managed [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-72 (XML+RDFa): Formalize XML+RDFa document conformance in RDFa Core [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-01-06 Manu Sporny
• Re: REVISED Telecon Agenda - January 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Nathan
• Re: REVISED Telecon Agenda - January 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Knud Hinnerk Möller
• RDFa Core Review: RDFa Profiles Jeni Tennison
• RDFa Core Review: Specification Structure Jeni Tennison
• Re: RDFa Core Review: Host Language conformance Jeni Tennison

Wednesday, 5 January 2011

• Re: RDFa Core Review: Host Language conformance Toby Inkster
• Re: RDFa Core Review: Host Language conformance Christoph LANGE
• RDFa Core Review: Host Language conformance Jeni Tennison
• Re: Last Call Comment: Support Token-like behavior in @prefix Ivan Herman
• Re: Last Call Comment: Support Token-like behavior in @prefix Toby Inkster
• Last Call Comment: Support Token-like behavior in @prefix Manu Sporny
• Re: Documenting SPARQL extension functions / js functions with fragid semantics Nathan
• Re: Documenting SPARQL extension functions Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 4 January 2011

• Documenting SPARQL extension functions Toby Inkster
• Re: Modularity ojection Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Nathan
• Re: IRIs are distinct from literal strings? Nathan
• Modularity ojection Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Tim Berners-Lee
• IRIs are distinct from literal strings? Tim Berners-Lee
• REVISED Telecon Agenda - January 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny
• Re: Telecon Agenda - January 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Toby Inkster
• Telecon Agenda - January 6th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-71 (Core - Shelley Powers): RDFa Core 1.1 LC comments from Shelley Powers [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-70 (Core - Jeni Tennison): RDFa Core 1.1 LC comments about versioning from Jeni Tennison [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 3 January 2011

• Re: RDFa Core Review: Versioning Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa Core Review: Versioning Toby Inkster
• RDFa Core Review: Versioning Jeni Tennison
• LC Comments Shelley Powers
• Modularity problem Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-33: Fix all WebIDL related issues regarding RDFa API Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Ivan Herman
• Re: Planning for first quarter of 2011 Ivan Herman
• Re: Planning for first quarter of 2011 Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-61: Does the RDFa API need a vocabulary helper Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-59: DataQuery support for other query languages Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-56: DataContext needs base for relative URI resolution Manu Sporny

Sunday, 2 January 2011

• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-54: Missing DataSerializer Interface Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-53: DataParser Interface Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-44: Processing remote documents Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-69 (xml and xmlns prefixes): Should the xml and xmlns prefixes be pre-defined in the default profile? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] Ivan Herman
• Re: Planning for first quarter of 2011 Ivan Herman
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-43: DataParser hasFeature() method Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-33: Fix all WebIDL related issues regarding RDFa API Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-29: RDFa API .origin property Manu Sporny
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-3: Updating HTML5 coercion to Infoset rules Manu Sporny
• Closing RDFa API issues Manu Sporny

Saturday, 1 January 2011

• Re: Planning for first quarter of 2011 Nathan
• Planning for first quarter of 2011 Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-69 (xml and xmlns prefixes): Should the xml and xmlns prefixes be pre-defined in the default profile? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker

Last message date: Monday, 31 January 2011 16:30:57 UTC