public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from February 2011 by date

Monday, 28 February 2011

Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Manu Sporny
Telecon Agenda - March 3rd 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny
Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Ivan Herman
Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Shane McCarron
Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Manu Sporny
Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Ivan Herman
Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Shane McCarron
Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Ivan Herman
Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Shane McCarron
ISSUE-86 (prefixes and terms): Determine if prefixes and terms can be collapsed into one concept in the RDFa API [RDF API] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-85 (projections and property groups): Determine whether both Projections and PropertyGroups are necessary [RDFa 1.1 API] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Ivan Herman

Sunday, 27 February 2011

Re: Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Shane McCarron
Re: A mnemonic for learning RDFa : APRIL Manu Sporny
A mnemonic for learning RDFa : APRIL Melvin Carvalho

Saturday, 26 February 2011

Re: terms and prefixes are the same in rdflib Ivan Herman
Re: terms and prefixes are the same in rdflib Nathan

Thursday, 24 February 2011

RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-24 Manu Sporny
terms and prefixes are the same in rdflib Ivan Herman
ISSUE-81: Specification Structure, Part 3. Steven Pemberton
ISSUE-80: Specification Structure, Part 2. Steven Pemberton
ISSUE-79: Specification Structure, Part 1. Steven Pemberton

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

'registering' other formats? Ivan Herman
HTML WG ISSUE-120 - Counter Arguments Manu Sporny
Telecon Agenda - February 24th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Monday, 21 February 2011

Re: Please get your AC rep to vote Ivan Herman
Re: Please get your AC rep to vote Shane McCarron
Please get your AC rep to vote Ivan Herman
Re: Draft WG response to Henri Sivonen's last call comments Manu Sporny

Sunday, 20 February 2011

Re: Comments on the profile management (Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring) Ivan Herman
Last Call Response to ISSUE-73: RDFa Profile management Manu Sporny
Re: Comments on the profile management (Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring) Manu Sporny
Comments on the profile management (Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring) Ivan Herman
Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring Ivan Herman
Re: RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring Manu Sporny
RDFa Default Profile Management/Vocabularies/Authoring Manu Sporny

Saturday, 19 February 2011

Re: ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni Ivan Herman
Re: ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni Ivan Herman

Friday, 18 February 2011

Re: ISSUE-70: Formal Response Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-67 triage Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni Shane McCarron
ISSUE-70: Formal Response Shane McCarron
ISSUE-70: PROPOSED response to Jeni Shane McCarron
Default profile files installed Ivan Herman

Thursday, 17 February 2011

RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-17 Manu Sporny
Re: Telecon Agenda - February 17th 2011, 1400 UTC Mark Birbeck
FYI: renewed RDFa Charter Ivan Herman
Telecon Agenda - February 17th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

Last Call comment (ISSUE-77) : default blank node generation in the header Ivan Herman
Re: GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Ivan Herman
Re: GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Shane McCarron
Re: GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Ivan Herman
Re: Draft WG response to Henri Sivonen's last call comments Ivan Herman

Monday, 14 February 2011

Re: Draft WG response to Henri Sivonen's last call comments Toby Inkster
Re: GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Toby Inkster
GRDDL and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Shane McCarron
Re: Editorial changes to clarify usage of URIs / Absolute URIs and @profile Shane McCarron
RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-14 Manu Sporny
Re: ISSUE-65: Michael Hausenblas' editorial comments (was Re: LC comments on RDFa Core 1.1) Michael Hausenblas
ISSUE-65: Michael Hausenblas' editorial comments (was Re: LC comments on RDFa Core 1.1) Shane McCarron
Re: URGENT: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling Shane McCarron
Re: URGENT: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling Manu Sporny
Re: URGENT: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling Ivan Herman
URGENT: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling Manu Sporny
Re: RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling Nathan
Re: Profile URI-s Ivan Herman
RDFa Super Session II: The Last Calling Manu Sporny
Re: Profile URI-s Manu Sporny

Sunday, 13 February 2011

Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 Toby Inkster

Friday, 11 February 2011

prefixes for the default rdfa profile (related to ACTION-62 ) Ivan Herman
Profile URI-s Ivan Herman

Thursday, 10 February 2011

RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-10 Manu Sporny
Re: Proposal about xmlns Manu Sporny
Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 Ivan Herman
Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 Nathan
Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 Ivan Herman
Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 Nathan
Re: Proposal about xmlns Sebastian Heath
Re: Proposal about xmlns Ivan Herman
Proposal about xmlns Nathan
Re: Telecon Agenda - February 10th 2011, 1400 UTC Benjamin Adrian
Re: PROPOSAL to address RDFa Profiles - ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78 Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 9 February 2011

Tuesday, 8 February 2011

Monday, 7 February 2011

Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] Andy Seaborne
Official response to your LC comment (recorded as ISSUE-69) Ivan Herman
Re: Clarification on the resolution of ISSUE-69 Ivan Herman
Re: Clarification on the resolution of ISSUE-69 Shane McCarron
Re: ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] Ivan Herman
Re: RDFa Default Profile Management Nathan
Re: RDFa Default Profile Management Ivan Herman
Re: RDFa Default Profile Management Nathan
Re: RDFa Default Profile Management Ivan Herman
Re: Proposal, allow Colon in a Term Nathan
Clarification on the resolution of ISSUE-69 Ivan Herman
Re: Proposal, allow Colon in a Term Ivan Herman
Re: Proposal, allow Colon in a Term Nathan
Proposal, allow Colon in a Term Nathan

Sunday, 6 February 2011

Saturday, 5 February 2011

TERMorCURIEorAbsURIs definition problem Nathan
ISSUE-83 (CURIEs must require colon): CURIEs are dangerous when used in combination with @vocab and @about [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
Problem(s) .. Prefix, colon, CURIE and term Nathan
Re: Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) Ivan Herman
Re: Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) Ivan Herman
Re: Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) Gregg Kellogg
Re: Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) Nathan
Built-in infinite recursion in our spec? (related to ISSUE-73 and ISSUE-78) Ivan Herman

Friday, 4 February 2011

Re: Processor graph vocabulary (ACTION-52 and ACTION-53 and ISSUE-67) Ivan Herman
Re: Processor graph vocabulary (ACTION-52 and ACTION-53 and ISSUE-67) Gregg Kellogg
Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) Ivan Herman
Re: Heads up - Distributed Extensibility is dead in HTML5 Nathan
Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) Toby Inkster
Heads up - Distributed Extensibility is dead in HTML5 Manu Sporny
Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) Ivan Herman
Re: Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) Toby Inkster
Processor graph vocabulary (ACTION-52 and ACTION-53 and ISSUE-67) Ivan Herman
Updated the document for the term/prefix vocabulary (ACTION-57) Ivan Herman
Backward compatibility v.a.v. terms in the charter (ACTION-58) Ivan Herman
Fw: ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals Toby Inkster

Thursday, 3 February 2011

RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-03 Manu Sporny
ISSUE-82: Can RDFa attributes be namespaced? RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
[Fwd: RE: Short briefing/background doc't regarding RDFa, prefixes and HTML] Nathan
Re: Removal of empty div/spans in Firefox (re: ISSUE-67 was: Re: Golly gosh!) Henri Sivonen

Wednesday, 2 February 2011

Draft WG response to Henri Sivonen's last call comments Toby Inkster
Re: Golly gosh! Michael[tm] Smith
Removal of empty div/spans in Firefox (re: ISSUE-67 was: Re: Golly gosh!) Manu Sporny
Processor Graph Vocabulary ( relevant to ACTION-52 and ISSUE-67 ) Ivan Herman
Followup on the processor graph discussion of yesterday ( on ACTION-53 , related to ISSUE-67 ) Ivan Herman
Re: Golly gosh! Niklas Lindström
Re: Golly gosh! Ivan Herman
Golly gosh! Toby Inkster
CORRECTION: Re: Telecon Agenda - February 3rd 2011, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
Telecon Agenda - February 4th 2011, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2011-02-01 Manu Sporny

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2011 22:14:24 UTC