Thursday, 30 September 2010
- Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
 - Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
 - Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
 - Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
 - Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
 - URI strings in literals
 - Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
 - Re: RDFa Meeting minutes...
 - RDFa Meeting minutes...
 - RDFa API more feedback
 - Re: (late) agenda for meeting, 2010-09-30
 - (late) agenda for meeting, 2010-09-30
 
Tuesday, 28 September 2010
- Re: empty prefix value
 - Re: empty prefix value
 - Re: empty prefix value
 - Re: empty prefix value
 - Re: empty prefix value
 - Re: empty prefix value
 - empty prefix value
 - RDFa API base & uri resolution
 
Friday, 24 September 2010
Thursday, 23 September 2010
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-09-23
 - Comment on the RDFa API working draft
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - September 23th 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
- Re: Ranging Properties
 - Re: Ranging Properties (was: Re: Musing on URI references vs. URI-s as string)
 - Ranging Properties (was: Re: Musing on URI references vs. URI-s as string)
 - Re: Musing on URI references vs. URI-s as string
 
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Sunday, 19 September 2010
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Monday, 20 September 2010
Sunday, 19 September 2010
- Re: RDFa API proposed changes & IDL
 - Re: RDFa API proposed changes & IDL
 - RDFa API proposed changes & IDL
 - Re: RDFa API implementation feedback
 - More notes on DataStore
 - RDFa API implementation feedback
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 
Saturday, 18 September 2010
Friday, 17 September 2010
Thursday, 16 September 2010
- RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-09-16
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: @profile
 - Re: @profile
 
Wednesday, 15 September 2010
- @profile
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - September 16th 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: Absorbing Microdata
 - Absorbing Microdata
 
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
- Telecon Agenda - September 16th 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
 - RDFa API Heartbeat Candidate 2 - 2010-09-13
 - Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
 
Monday, 13 September 2010
- Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
 - Re: RDFa API Heartbeat Candidate 1 - 2010-09-12
 - Re: RDFa API Heartbeat Candidate 1 - 2010-09-12
 - RDFa API Heartbeat Candidate 1 - 2010-09-12
 - Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
 
Friday, 10 September 2010
- Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 
Thursday, 9 September 2010
- Re: Small @profile question
 - Re: Small @profile question
 - Small @profile question
 - Meeting minutes, 2010-09-09
 
Wednesday, 8 September 2010
- Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Class diagrams for the RDFa API
 - Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: RDF JS API (aka RDFa API)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Re: New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
 - Re: Fwd: RDF JS API (aka RDFa API)
 - Fwd: RDF JS API (aka RDFa API)
 - Re: Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Ongoing objection to RDFa Profiles format (as XHTML+RDFa)
 - Telecon Agenda - September 9th 2010, 1400 UTC
 
Monday, 6 September 2010
- Re 2: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-34: meta-name triple generation
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-36: default vocab specification
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-34: meta-name triple generation
 - Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-12: Benji's wishlist
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 
Sunday, 5 September 2010
- Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 - Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-42: DOMString vs. string
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-40: no triples for empty elements
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-36: default vocab specification
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-34: meta-name triple generation
 - New Editors draft of RDFa API spec
 - property hooks for RDFa API
 
Saturday, 4 September 2010
- DataStore.forEach
 - Re: RDFa API: ondata="javascript: foo();" attribute for <body> element?
 - rdf-rdfa and rdf_context update to RDFa Core 1.1 2010-08-03
 - Re: RDFa API: ondata="javascript: foo();" attribute for <body> element?
 - Re: RDFa API: ondata="javascript: foo();" attribute for <body> element?
 - RDFa API: ondata="javascript: foo();" attribute for <body> element?
 
Friday, 3 September 2010
Thursday, 2 September 2010
- Closing issues that may have consensus
 - Proposal to close ISSUE-12: Benji's wishlist
 - PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-11: default prefix declarations
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - September 2nd 2010, 1400 UTC