- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:31:00 +0000
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: RDFA Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Very good point, Nathan (and Tom). What about signing the data via a predicate? If it's absent, a strict parser might ignore the triples. And if it's present, its value must match a value computed in much the same way that XML Signatures [1] work...or perhaps a little simpler. ;) In fact...Manu mentioned to me the other day that his company recently had need to sign instances of JSON-LD; perhaps we need to look at generalising whatever it was that they did. Any thoughts on this, Manu? Did you add the signature as a predicate, or was it outside of the RDF? (Once you've finished your turkey, of course.) Mark [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > If we lift RDFa from the DOM, and the DOM can be manipulated via JS before > lifting the RDF graph, then how does one trust the RDFa? > > Also, how should parsers treat <iframes>? > > Two interesting points via Tom Morris, > > Best, > > Nathan > >
Received on Thursday, 25 November 2010 19:32:11 UTC