- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:57:47 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On 10.11.2010 13:49, Toby Inkster wrote: > Both Google and Facebook seem to consume subsets of RDFa. > > Some subsets of RDFa are safer to consume than others though, as this > Wiki page demonstrates: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Subsets > > I think it would be useful for this WG to publish as a note something > like the above, as guidance for people wishing to implement partial > RDFa processors. > > Alternatively this could be added as informative guidance to RDFa Core, > but I think it would overcomplicate the spec. Hi, as somebody only occasionally watching: YES. I fear that the new profile feature introduces an indirection mechanism that is likely to cause more confusion than XML namespace prefixes will ever manage to, so identifying a subset of RDFa that can be processed without having to consult an additional resource seems to be very much needed. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 17:58:32 UTC