- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:28:09 +0000
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Checking through http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/, I don't see describedby (any capitalisation) in any section. But there is a definition of meta. I /think/ this is the only definition of this term, despite it having been in common use for a long time? It was partly that fact that lead us to suggest describedby, i.e. start from a clean slate where there was (hopefully) no a priori assumption about what it would link to. Phil. On 09/11/2010 18:53, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:43:14 -0600 > Shane McCarron<shane@aptest.com> wrote: > >> Note that there are a number of ARIA terms in there too. One of >> which is describedBy (I think). > > ARIA has a describedby attribute, but the XHTML vocab only include's > ARIA's roles. >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 19:28:43 UTC