- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:02:10 -0500
- To: mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Yeah. That. Thanks Mark! On 11/1/2010 12:51 PM, Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Shane, > >> I agree... I don't actually know why this is in here at all though. The >> rule seems stupid to me... It always did. The element in question should be >> 'html' shouldn't it? > Just because you can't remember the rationale, doesn't make it stupid... ;) > > A common pattern that authors started to use around the time we > discussed this issue was placing a @typeof on<body> (and sometimes > <head>). > > We agreed that we wanted the @typeof to apply to the document's URI > rather than generating new bnodes, but if we were to place this 'empty > @about' rule on<html> then we'd still get bnodes. I.e., it would have > the same effect as this: > > <html about=""> > <head typeof="a:Document"> > ... > </html> > > The rule that we actually adopted has the same effect as this: > > <html> > <head about="" typeof="a:Document"> > ... > </html> > > Regards, > > Mark > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 18:03:06 UTC